1985•CarcinogenesisRequires access

Species differences in the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of 2-acetylaminofluorene and its primary metabolites 2-aminofluorene and N-OH-2-acetylaminofluorene

Jørn Andreas Holme, Erik J. Søderlund

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

2-Acetylaminofluorene (AAF), 2-aminofluorene (AF) and N-hydroxy-2-acetylaminofluorene (N-OH-AAF) could be activated to mutagens in S. typhimurium using either 9000 g supernatant (S9) or hepatocytes isolated from rats, mice, hamsters or guinea pigs. Their relative mutagenic potency was generally N-OH-AAF greater than AF greater than AAF. Monolayer cultures of hepatocytes exposed to AAF/AF/N-OH-AAF showed evidence of DNA damage measured as unscheduled DNA repair synthesis. The order of activity in rat and hamster was N-OH-AAF greater than AAF greater than AF, in guinea pig and mouse N-OH-AAF greater than AF greater than AAF. Only N-OH-AAF caused observable cytotoxicity, and the rat hepatocytes were the far more sensitive species. Neither the resistance of guinea pig liver nor the greater susceptibility of the rat liver to the carcinogenic effects of AAF and N-OH-AAF could be readily explained by the species differences in activating these compounds to mutagens in Salmonella or to DNA damaging agents in the hepatocytes. It is possible that cytotoxic effects of N-OH-AAF may be of some importance for the observed species differences in the liver carcinogenic effects of AAF and N-OH-AAF.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

2-Acetylaminofluorene (AAF), 2-aminofluorene (AF) and N-hydroxy-2-acetylaminofluorene (N-OH-AAF) could be activated to mutagens in S. typhimurium using either 9000 g supernatant (S9) or hepatocytes isolated from rats, mice, hamsters or guinea pigs. Their relative mutagenic potency was generally N-OH-AAF greater than AF greater than AAF. Monolayer cultures of hepatocytes exposed to AAF/AF/N-OH-AAF showed evidence of DNA damage measured as unscheduled DNA repair synthesis. The order of activity in rat and hamster was N-OH-AAF greater than AAF greater than AF, in guinea pig and mouse N-OH-AAF greater than AF greater than AAF. Only N-OH-AAF caused observable cytotoxicity, and the rat hepatocytes were the far more sensitive species. Neither the resistance of guinea pig liver nor the greater susceptibility of the rat liver to the carcinogenic effects of AAF and N-OH-AAF could be readily explained by the species differences in activating these compounds to mutagens in Salmonella or to DNA damaging agents in the hepatocytes. It is possible that cytotoxic effects of N-OH-AAF may be of some importance for the observed species differences in the liver carcinogenic effects of AAF and N-OH-AAF.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

2-Acetylaminofluorene (AAF), 2-aminofluorene (AF) and N-hydroxy-2-acetylaminofluorene (N-OH-AAF) could be activated to mutagens in S. typhimurium using either 9000 g supernatant (S9) or hepatocytes isolated from rats, mice, hamsters or guinea pigs. Their relative mutagenic potency was generally N-OH-AAF greater than AF greater than AAF. Monolayer cultures of hepatocytes exposed to AAF/AF/N-OH-AAF showed evidence of DNA damage measured as unscheduled DNA repair synthesis. The order of activity in rat and hamster was N-OH-AAF greater than AAF greater than AF, in guinea pig and mouse N-OH-AAF greater than AF greater than AAF. Only N-OH-AAF caused observable cytotoxicity, and the rat hepatocytes were the far more sensitive species. Neither the resistance of guinea pig liver nor the greater susceptibility of the rat liver to the carcinogenic effects of AAF and N-OH-AAF could be readily explained by the species differences in activating these compounds to mutagens in Salmonella or to DNA damaging agents in the hepatocytes. It is possible that cytotoxic effects of N-OH-AAF may be of some importance for the observed species differences in the liver carcinogenic effects of AAF and N-OH-AAF.

Key concepts: 2-Acetylaminofluorene, Carcinogen, Hamster, Chemistry, Guinea pig, Molecular biology, DNA, Biochemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Species differences in the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of 2-acetylaminofluorene and its primary metabolites 2-aminofluorene and N-OH-2-acetylaminofluorene — Research Paper | ScholarLens