1952JAMARequires access

NITRITE AND THIOSULFATE THERAPY IN CYANIDE POISONING

K. K. Chen

Open publisher page 205 citations

Abstract

In 1932 Geiger1began to use methylene blue in treatment of cyanide poisoning. The antidotal action of the dye was shown by Wendel2and Hug3to be due to the formation of methemoglobin, which successfully competes with the respiratory enzyme, ferricytochrome oxidase, for cyanide ions. Subsequent reports4indicate that methylene blue is not an efficient antidote because it is a poor methemoglobin former and at the same time reverses the reaction in presence of co-enzyme.5In fact, the dye is of greater value in the treatment of methemoglobinemia6than in cyanide poisoning. Nevertheless, the trial of methylene blue stimulated a renewed search for cyanide antidotes, and led to the discovery of a more effective therapy. Independent investigations in Argentina7and the United States4agave rise to a clear-cut conclusion that the combination of sodium nitrite and sodium thiosulfate, consecutively injected by vein,

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 1932 Geiger1began to use methylene blue in treatment of cyanide poisoning. The antidotal action of the dye was shown by Wendel2and Hug3to be due to the formation of methemoglobin, which successfully competes with the respiratory enzyme, ferricytochrome oxidase, for cyanide ions. Subsequent reports4indicate that methylene blue is not an efficient antidote because it is a poor methemoglobin former and at the same time reverses the reaction in presence of co-enzyme.5In fact, the dye is of greater value in the treatment of methemoglobinemia6than in cyanide poisoning. Nevertheless, the trial of methylene blue stimulated a renewed search for cyanide antidotes, and led to the discovery of a more effective therapy. Independent investigations in Argentina7and the United States4agave rise to a clear-cut conclusion that the combination of sodium nitrite and sodium thiosulfate, consecutively injected by vein,

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 205 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 1932 Geiger1began to use methylene blue in treatment of cyanide poisoning. The antidotal action of the dye was shown by Wendel2and Hug3to be due to the formation of methemoglobin, which successfully competes with the respiratory enzyme, ferricytochrome oxidase, for cyanide ions. Subsequent reports4indicate that methylene blue is not an efficient antidote because it is a poor methemoglobin former and at the same time reverses the reaction in presence of co-enzyme.5In fact, the dye is of greater value in the treatment of methemoglobinemia6than in cyanide poisoning. Nevertheless, the trial of methylene blue stimulated a renewed search for cyanide antidotes, and led to the discovery of a more effective therapy. Independent investigations in Argentina7and the United States4agave rise to a clear-cut conclusion that the combination of sodium nitrite and sodium thiosulfate, consecutively injected by vein,

Key concepts: Cyanide poisoning, Thiosulfate, Cyanide, Nitrite, Chemistry, Medicine, Environmental chemistry, Inorganic chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
NITRITE AND THIOSULFATE THERAPY IN CYANIDE POISONING — Research Paper | ScholarLens