2005New Journal of ChemistryRequires access

Coordination properties of glycylglycine to Cu+, Ni+ and Co+. Influence of metal cation electronic configuration

Erika Constantino, Albert Rimola, Luis Rodrı́guez-Santiago, Mariona Sodupe

Open publisher page 32 citations

Abstract

The structure, vibrational frequencies and binding energies of the complexes formed by the interaction of Cu+(d10, 1S), Ni+(d9, 2D) and Co+(d8, 3F and 1G) with glycylglycine have been theoretically determined. The most stable structure of Cu+–glycylglycine is bicoordinated with the Cu+ cation interacting with the terminal carbonyl oxygen and the amino group. However, for Ni+–glycylglycine and Co+–glycylglycine the lowest energy structures are tricoordinated, the interaction of the metal cation given by the same groups of Cu+-glycylglycine plus the nitrogen or oxygen atoms of the peptide bond. As for glycine, De values follow the order Ni+ > Co+ (triplet) ∼ Cu+, but the interaction energies are about 11–13 kcal mol−1 larger. Differences on the coordination properties of the metal cations are discussed and interpreted according to their electronic structure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The structure, vibrational frequencies and binding energies of the complexes formed by the interaction of Cu+(d10, 1S), Ni+(d9, 2D) and Co+(d8, 3F and 1G) with glycylglycine have been theoretically determined. The most stable structure of Cu+–glycylglycine is bicoordinated with the Cu+ cation interacting with the terminal carbonyl oxygen and the amino group. However, for Ni+–glycylglycine and Co+–glycylglycine the lowest energy structures are tricoordinated, the interaction of the metal cation given by the same groups of Cu+-glycylglycine plus the nitrogen or oxygen atoms of the peptide bond. As for glycine, De values follow the order Ni+ > Co+ (triplet) ∼ Cu+, but the interaction energies are about 11–13 kcal mol−1 larger. Differences on the coordination properties of the metal cations are discussed and interpreted according to their electronic structure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The structure, vibrational frequencies and binding energies of the complexes formed by the interaction of Cu+(d10, 1S), Ni+(d9, 2D) and Co+(d8, 3F and 1G) with glycylglycine have been theoretically determined. The most stable structure of Cu+–glycylglycine is bicoordinated with the Cu+ cation interacting with the terminal carbonyl oxygen and the amino group. However, for Ni+–glycylglycine and Co+–glycylglycine the lowest energy structures are tricoordinated, the interaction of the metal cation given by the same groups of Cu+-glycylglycine plus the nitrogen or oxygen atoms of the peptide bond. As for glycine, De values follow the order Ni+ > Co+ (triplet) ∼ Cu+, but the interaction energies are about 11–13 kcal mol−1 larger. Differences on the coordination properties of the metal cations are discussed and interpreted according to their electronic structure.

Key concepts: Glycylglycine, Chemistry, Metal, Inorganic chemistry, Dipeptide, Crystallography, Copper, Glycine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Coordination properties of glycylglycine to Cu+, Ni+ and Co+. Influence of metal cation electronic configuration — Research Paper | ScholarLens