2005The American Journal of GastroenterologyRequires access

Detection of Bacterial Overgrowth in IBS Using the Lactulose H2 Breath Test: Comparison with 14C-d-Xylose and Healthy Controls

Bruce J. Walters, Stephen Vanner

Open publisher page 172 citations

Abstract

UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVES Recent reports suggest bacterial overgrowth is commonly associated with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) when diagnosed using the lactulose hydrogen breath test (LHBT). We employed this test to examine whether similar findings exist in a geographically distinct population of Rome II positive IBS patients and compared it to the 14C-D-xylose breath test, a test with acknowledged greater specificity for bacterial overgrowth. METHODS: In the first series, Rome II IBS patients underwent a 10 g lactulose breath test and a standardized 1 g 14C-D-xylose breath test and answered IBS symptom questionnaires. A positive test required an elevated breath hydrogen concentration within 90 min, two distinct peaks, and an increase >20 ppm. In a second series, control patients lacking gastrointestinal symptoms underwent a lactulose breath test. A positive test required an elevation of breath hydrogen >20 ppm within 90 or 180 min. These criteria were also applied to lactulose breath tests from IBS cases in series one. RESULTS: The IBS patients were predominantly female (64%) and most reported severe symptoms (80%). The majority had diarrhea predominant symptoms (63%) and only 3% were constipation predominant. In the first series, only 10% of patients had a positive lactulose breath test and 13% had a positive 14C-D-xylose test. In the second series, the number of abnormal LHBTs was much higher but no differences were found between IBS patients and controls. CONCLUSION: The lactulose breath test did not reliably detect a common association between bacterial overgrowth and IBS in our patient population.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVES Recent reports suggest bacterial overgrowth is commonly associated with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) when diagnosed using the lactulose hydrogen breath test (LHBT). We employed this test to examine whether similar findings exist in a geographically distinct population of Rome II positive IBS patients and compared it to the 14C-D-xylose breath test, a test with acknowledged greater specificity for bacterial overgrowth. METHODS: In the first series, Rome II IBS patients underwent a 10 g lactulose breath test and a standardized 1 g 14C-D-xylose breath test and answered IBS symptom questionnaires. A positive test required an elevated breath hydrogen concentration within 90 min, two distinct peaks, and an increase >20 ppm. In a second series, control patients lacking gastrointestinal symptoms underwent a lactulose breath test. A positive test required an elevation of breath hydrogen >20 ppm within 90 or 180 min. These criteria were also applied to lactulose breath tests from IBS cases in series one. RESULTS: The IBS patients were predominantly female (64%) and most reported severe symptoms (80%). The majority had diarrhea predominant symptoms (63%) and only 3% were constipation predominant. In the first series, only 10% of patients had a positive lactulose breath test and 13% had a positive 14C-D-xylose test. In the second series, the number of abnormal LHBTs was much higher but no differences were found between IBS patients and controls. CONCLUSION: The lactulose breath test did not reliably detect a common association between bacterial overgrowth and IBS in our patient population.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 172 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVES Recent reports suggest bacterial overgrowth is commonly associated with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) when diagnosed using the lactulose hydrogen breath test (LHBT). We employed this test to examine whether similar findings exist in a geographically distinct population of Rome II positive IBS patients and compared it to the 14C-D-xylose breath test, a test with acknowledged greater specificity for bacterial overgrowth. METHODS: In the first series, Rome II IBS patients underwent a 10 g lactulose breath test and a standardized 1 g 14C-D-xylose breath test and answered IBS symptom questionnaires. A positive test required an elevated breath hydrogen concentration within 90 min, two distinct peaks, and an increase >20 ppm. In a second series, control patients lacking gastrointestinal symptoms underwent a lactulose breath test. A positive test required an elevation of breath hydrogen >20 ppm within 90 or 180 min. These criteria were also applied to lactulose breath tests from IBS cases in series one. RESULTS: The IBS patients were predominantly female (64%) and most reported severe symptoms (80%). The majority had diarrhea predominant symptoms (63%) and only 3% were constipation predominant. In the first series, only 10% of patients had a positive lactulose breath test and 13% had a positive 14C-D-xylose test. In the second series, the number of abnormal LHBTs was much higher but no differences were found between IBS patients and controls. CONCLUSION: The lactulose breath test did not reliably detect a common association between bacterial overgrowth and IBS in our patient population.

Key concepts: Lactulose, Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, Breath test, Medicine, Irritable bowel syndrome, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Hydrogen breath test

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Detection of Bacterial Overgrowth in IBS Using the Lactulose H2 Breath Test: Comparison with 14C-d-Xylose and Healthy Controls — Research Paper | ScholarLens