Secondary school teachers' awareness of numerical examples as proof
Michal Tabach, Esther Levenson, Ruthi Barkai, Dina Tirosh, Pessia Tsamir, Tommy Dreyfus
Abstract
Michal Tabach, Esther Levenson, Ruthi Barkai, Dina Tirosh, Pessia Tsamir, Tommy Dreyfus
Abstract
Some mathematical statements can be validated by a supportive example or refuted by a counterexample. Our study investigated secondary school teachers' knowledge of such proofs. Fifty practising secondary school teachers were first asked to validate/refute six elementary number theory statements, then to suggest justifications that students might give for the same statements, and finally to judge eighteen numerical justifications for the same statements. The findings indicated that teachers are well acquainted with numerical examples and counterexamples as proofs. We also found that teachers' considerations for accepting given justifications involve mathematical aspects as well as didactical ones. Teachers are less familiar with students' tendencies to bring more than one example or counterexample in such proofs.
OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Some mathematical statements can be validated by a supportive example or refuted by a counterexample. Our study investigated secondary school teachers' knowledge of such proofs. Fifty practising secondary school teachers were first asked to validate/refute six elementary number theory statements, then to suggest justifications that students might give for the same statements, and finally to judge eighteen numerical justifications for the same statements. The findings indicated that teachers are well acquainted with numerical examples and counterexamples as proofs. We also found that teachers' considerations for accepting given justifications involve mathematical aspects as well as didactical ones. Teachers are less familiar with students' tendencies to bring more than one example or counterexample in such proofs.
Key concepts: Counterexample, Mathematical proof, Mathematics education, Mathematical practice, Mathematical logic, Mathematics, School teachers, Calculus (dental)