2010Research in Mathematics EducationRequires access

Secondary school teachers' awareness of numerical examples as proof

Michal Tabach, Esther Levenson, Ruthi Barkai, Dina Tirosh, Pessia Tsamir, Tommy Dreyfus

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

Some mathematical statements can be validated by a supportive example or refuted by a counterexample. Our study investigated secondary school teachers' knowledge of such proofs. Fifty practising secondary school teachers were first asked to validate/refute six elementary number theory statements, then to suggest justifications that students might give for the same statements, and finally to judge eighteen numerical justifications for the same statements. The findings indicated that teachers are well acquainted with numerical examples and counterexamples as proofs. We also found that teachers' considerations for accepting given justifications involve mathematical aspects as well as didactical ones. Teachers are less familiar with students' tendencies to bring more than one example or counterexample in such proofs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Some mathematical statements can be validated by a supportive example or refuted by a counterexample. Our study investigated secondary school teachers' knowledge of such proofs. Fifty practising secondary school teachers were first asked to validate/refute six elementary number theory statements, then to suggest justifications that students might give for the same statements, and finally to judge eighteen numerical justifications for the same statements. The findings indicated that teachers are well acquainted with numerical examples and counterexamples as proofs. We also found that teachers' considerations for accepting given justifications involve mathematical aspects as well as didactical ones. Teachers are less familiar with students' tendencies to bring more than one example or counterexample in such proofs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Some mathematical statements can be validated by a supportive example or refuted by a counterexample. Our study investigated secondary school teachers' knowledge of such proofs. Fifty practising secondary school teachers were first asked to validate/refute six elementary number theory statements, then to suggest justifications that students might give for the same statements, and finally to judge eighteen numerical justifications for the same statements. The findings indicated that teachers are well acquainted with numerical examples and counterexamples as proofs. We also found that teachers' considerations for accepting given justifications involve mathematical aspects as well as didactical ones. Teachers are less familiar with students' tendencies to bring more than one example or counterexample in such proofs.

Key concepts: Counterexample, Mathematical proof, Mathematics education, Mathematical practice, Mathematical logic, Mathematics, School teachers, Calculus (dental)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Secondary school teachers' awareness of numerical examples as proof — Research Paper | ScholarLens