1984•Unpublished venueRequires access

Validation of a wall-interference assessment/correction procedure for airfoil tests in the Langley 0.3-meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel

Clyde R. Gumbert, P. NEWMAN

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Validation of a wall-interference assessment/correction (WIAC) procedure for a given facility requires its application to several sets of test data. It is necessary therefore to create a somewhat automated method for processing data through the various steps in the procedure. An automated procedure is also welcomed by the test engineer or eventual user in order to reduce the required effort and opportunity for error. Such a procedure has been developed for the Langley 0.3-m Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel using the TWINTN4 WIAC code. This code provides a four-wall, 2-D, transonic correction; that is, it accounts for sidewall boundary-layer effects, as well as for top and bottom wall effects on the airfoil tests. The TWINTN4 code utilizes measured pressure data at the tunnel walls and on the airfoil model; thus, classical homogeneous-wall boundary conditions are not used in the correction procedure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Validation of a wall-interference assessment/correction (WIAC) procedure for a given facility requires its application to several sets of test data. It is necessary therefore to create a somewhat automated method for processing data through the various steps in the procedure. An automated procedure is also welcomed by the test engineer or eventual user in order to reduce the required effort and opportunity for error. Such a procedure has been developed for the Langley 0.3-m Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel using the TWINTN4 WIAC code. This code provides a four-wall, 2-D, transonic correction; that is, it accounts for sidewall boundary-layer effects, as well as for top and bottom wall effects on the airfoil tests. The TWINTN4 code utilizes measured pressure data at the tunnel walls and on the airfoil model; thus, classical homogeneous-wall boundary conditions are not used in the correction procedure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Validation of a wall-interference assessment/correction (WIAC) procedure for a given facility requires its application to several sets of test data. It is necessary therefore to create a somewhat automated method for processing data through the various steps in the procedure. An automated procedure is also welcomed by the test engineer or eventual user in order to reduce the required effort and opportunity for error. Such a procedure has been developed for the Langley 0.3-m Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel using the TWINTN4 WIAC code. This code provides a four-wall, 2-D, transonic correction; that is, it accounts for sidewall boundary-layer effects, as well as for top and bottom wall effects on the airfoil tests. The TWINTN4 code utilizes measured pressure data at the tunnel walls and on the airfoil model; thus, classical homogeneous-wall boundary conditions are not used in the correction procedure.

Key concepts: Transonic, Airfoil, Metre, Interference (communication), Aerospace engineering, Wind tunnel, Marine engineering, Aeronautics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Validation of a wall-interference assessment/correction procedure for airfoil tests in the Langley 0.3-meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel — Research Paper | ScholarLens