2009Journal of the Intensive Care SocietyRequires access

Base Specialty Survey – Implications for Future Staffing of UK Intensive Care Units

Malcolm Sim, Kate Osborne, Daniel Harvey, Michael A. Irvine, Rachael Challiner, Ravindra Kumar, Sam Hutchings, Dan Strong, Timothy Felton, Sam Waddy, Andrew Cadamy, Juliane Kause

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Intensive care units in the UK have traditionally been staffed by consultants whose background specialty is anaesthesia. As the specialty of intensive care medicine continues to expand, it is becoming increasingly attractive to doctors from other disciplines, particularly emergency medicine and the medical specialties. The Trainee Division Committee of the Intensive Care Society is concerned that trainees from non-anaesthetic base specialties reaching the end of their training could have difficulty securing consultant positions if available jobs are linked only with sessions in anaesthesia. In order to gauge the scale of this potential problem, we elected to ascertain the base specialty of consultants currently working in intensive care in the UK to establish how large the discrepancy is between the number of non-anaesthetic doctors in training in intensive care and the number of non-anaesthetic consultants currently in post.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Intensive care units in the UK have traditionally been staffed by consultants whose background specialty is anaesthesia. As the specialty of intensive care medicine continues to expand, it is becoming increasingly attractive to doctors from other disciplines, particularly emergency medicine and the medical specialties. The Trainee Division Committee of the Intensive Care Society is concerned that trainees from non-anaesthetic base specialties reaching the end of their training could have difficulty securing consultant positions if available jobs are linked only with sessions in anaesthesia. In order to gauge the scale of this potential problem, we elected to ascertain the base specialty of consultants currently working in intensive care in the UK to establish how large the discrepancy is between the number of non-anaesthetic doctors in training in intensive care and the number of non-anaesthetic consultants currently in post.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Intensive care units in the UK have traditionally been staffed by consultants whose background specialty is anaesthesia. As the specialty of intensive care medicine continues to expand, it is becoming increasingly attractive to doctors from other disciplines, particularly emergency medicine and the medical specialties. The Trainee Division Committee of the Intensive Care Society is concerned that trainees from non-anaesthetic base specialties reaching the end of their training could have difficulty securing consultant positions if available jobs are linked only with sessions in anaesthesia. In order to gauge the scale of this potential problem, we elected to ascertain the base specialty of consultants currently working in intensive care in the UK to establish how large the discrepancy is between the number of non-anaesthetic doctors in training in intensive care and the number of non-anaesthetic consultants currently in post.

Key concepts: Specialty, Staffing, Intensive care, Medicine, Intensive care unit, Nursing, Medical emergency, Family medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Base Specialty Survey – Implications for Future Staffing of UK Intensive Care Units — Research Paper | ScholarLens