2000The Journal of Infectious DiseasesOpen access

Lack of Benefit of Intravenous Immune Globulin in a Murine Model of Group A Streptococcal Necrotizing Fasciitis

Robin Patel, Mark S. Rouse, Monica V. Florez, Kerryl E. Piper, Franklin R. Cockerill, Walter R. Wilson, James M. Steckelberg

Open full text 27 citations

Abstract

Penicillin, clindamycin, and intravenous immune globulin (Venoglobulin-S; IVIG) alone and in combination were studied in a murine model of group A streptococcal necrotizing fasciitis. As assessed by bacterial clearance, treatment with IVIG was not significantly different from no treatment. All treatment regimens that contained penicillin or clindamycin were more effective (P<.05) than no treatment or treatment with IVIG alone. No significant differences were detected among results of treatment with penicillin, penicillin/clindamycin, penicillin/IVIG, clindamycin/IVIG, or all agents combined. Clindamycin alone was less effective than penicillin/IVIG (P=.02), penicillin/clindamycin (P=.009), clindamycin/IVIG (P=.04), or all agents combined (P=.02). No antagonism was observed with the addition of clindamycin or IVIG to penicillin.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Penicillin, clindamycin, and intravenous immune globulin (Venoglobulin-S; IVIG) alone and in combination were studied in a murine model of group A streptococcal necrotizing fasciitis. As assessed by bacterial clearance, treatment with IVIG was not significantly different from no treatment. All treatment regimens that contained penicillin or clindamycin were more effective (P<.05) than no treatment or treatment with IVIG alone. No significant differences were detected among results of treatment with penicillin, penicillin/clindamycin, penicillin/IVIG, clindamycin/IVIG, or all agents combined. Clindamycin alone was less effective than penicillin/IVIG (P=.02), penicillin/clindamycin (P=.009), clindamycin/IVIG (P=.04), or all agents combined (P=.02). No antagonism was observed with the addition of clindamycin or IVIG to penicillin.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 27 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Penicillin, clindamycin, and intravenous immune globulin (Venoglobulin-S; IVIG) alone and in combination were studied in a murine model of group A streptococcal necrotizing fasciitis. As assessed by bacterial clearance, treatment with IVIG was not significantly different from no treatment. All treatment regimens that contained penicillin or clindamycin were more effective (P<.05) than no treatment or treatment with IVIG alone. No significant differences were detected among results of treatment with penicillin, penicillin/clindamycin, penicillin/IVIG, clindamycin/IVIG, or all agents combined. Clindamycin alone was less effective than penicillin/IVIG (P=.02), penicillin/clindamycin (P=.009), clindamycin/IVIG (P=.04), or all agents combined (P=.02). No antagonism was observed with the addition of clindamycin or IVIG to penicillin.

Key concepts: Clindamycin, Penicillin, Medicine, Fasciitis, Antibiotics, Immunology, Microbiology, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Lack of Benefit of Intravenous Immune Globulin in a Murine Model of Group A Streptococcal Necrotizing Fasciitis — Research Paper | ScholarLens