2010•American Behavioral ScientistRequires access

A Time for Change and a Candidate’s Voice: Pragmatism and the Rhetoric of Inclusion in Barack Obama’s 2008 Presidential Campaign

Keith B. Jenkins, Grant C. Cos

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

The lens of presidential rhetorical studies provides a solid foundation for understanding Barack Obama’s campaign rhetoric. This study analyzes Barack Obama’s strategies to create a pragmatic moral voice for the presidency. The authors argue that Obama’s inclusive rhetorical campaign incorporated a rhetorical pragmatism. Rhetorical pragmatism is understood as discourse that negotiates uncertainty, generates knowledge based on human interest, expresses individualism (pluralism), and builds communities. The ends of this discourse are the means for achieving all of these. The authors found that the uncertainty of the nation’s political, social, and rhetorical situations constituted the foundation on which all Obama’s claims were staged. The ends of his campaign rhetoric were the traditional concern of constituting and reconstituting community. The authors believe, to fully appreciate Obama’s campaign rhetoric, scholars need to observe how he reconstituted an American moral voice. In uncertain times, Americans could know that there were core ideals that they could hold up and live under. They could understand the individual stories and, with the help of an adept rhetor, connect their known experience to others to reassert the meaning of America.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The lens of presidential rhetorical studies provides a solid foundation for understanding Barack Obama’s campaign rhetoric. This study analyzes Barack Obama’s strategies to create a pragmatic moral voice for the presidency. The authors argue that Obama’s inclusive rhetorical campaign incorporated a rhetorical pragmatism. Rhetorical pragmatism is understood as discourse that negotiates uncertainty, generates knowledge based on human interest, expresses individualism (pluralism), and builds communities. The ends of this discourse are the means for achieving all of these. The authors found that the uncertainty of the nation’s political, social, and rhetorical situations constituted the foundation on which all Obama’s claims were staged. The ends of his campaign rhetoric were the traditional concern of constituting and reconstituting community. The authors believe, to fully appreciate Obama’s campaign rhetoric, scholars need to observe how he reconstituted an American moral voice. In uncertain times, Americans could know that there were core ideals that they could hold up and live under. They could understand the individual stories and, with the help of an adept rhetor, connect their known experience to others to reassert the meaning of America.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The lens of presidential rhetorical studies provides a solid foundation for understanding Barack Obama’s campaign rhetoric. This study analyzes Barack Obama’s strategies to create a pragmatic moral voice for the presidency. The authors argue that Obama’s inclusive rhetorical campaign incorporated a rhetorical pragmatism. Rhetorical pragmatism is understood as discourse that negotiates uncertainty, generates knowledge based on human interest, expresses individualism (pluralism), and builds communities. The ends of this discourse are the means for achieving all of these. The authors found that the uncertainty of the nation’s political, social, and rhetorical situations constituted the foundation on which all Obama’s claims were staged. The ends of his campaign rhetoric were the traditional concern of constituting and reconstituting community. The authors believe, to fully appreciate Obama’s campaign rhetoric, scholars need to observe how he reconstituted an American moral voice. In uncertain times, Americans could know that there were core ideals that they could hold up and live under. They could understand the individual stories and, with the help of an adept rhetor, connect their known experience to others to reassert the meaning of America.

Key concepts: Rhetoric, Rhetorical question, Pluralism (philosophy), Pragmatism, Sociology, Presidency, Politics, Presidential system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Time for Change and a Candidate’s Voice: Pragmatism and the Rhetoric of Inclusion in Barack Obama’s 2008 Presidential Campaign — Research Paper | ScholarLens