1995•Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentRequires access

Comparison of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Second Edition and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development with Premature Infants

Donald J. Goldstein, Ellen E. Fogle, Jamie L. Wieber, Tim M. O’Shea

Open publisher page 25 citations

Abstract

The Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Second Edition (BSID-II) and Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) were administered concurrently to 49 high-risk, preterm infants. Results suggested that scores from the two tests were correlated very highly. As expected, mean scores on the BSID-II were lower than on the BSID. Classification of infants as “normal,” “borderline,” and “abnormal” on each test resulted in excellent agreement for mental development scores, but only fair agreement for psychomotor scores. Findings were interpreted as adding support to the clinical validity of the BSID-II, and implications of lower scores on the BSID II were discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Second Edition (BSID-II) and Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) were administered concurrently to 49 high-risk, preterm infants. Results suggested that scores from the two tests were correlated very highly. As expected, mean scores on the BSID-II were lower than on the BSID. Classification of infants as “normal,” “borderline,” and “abnormal” on each test resulted in excellent agreement for mental development scores, but only fair agreement for psychomotor scores. Findings were interpreted as adding support to the clinical validity of the BSID-II, and implications of lower scores on the BSID II were discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Second Edition (BSID-II) and Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) were administered concurrently to 49 high-risk, preterm infants. Results suggested that scores from the two tests were correlated very highly. As expected, mean scores on the BSID-II were lower than on the BSID. Classification of infants as “normal,” “borderline,” and “abnormal” on each test resulted in excellent agreement for mental development scores, but only fair agreement for psychomotor scores. Findings were interpreted as adding support to the clinical validity of the BSID-II, and implications of lower scores on the BSID II were discussed.

Key concepts: Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Psychomotor learning, Psychology, Infant development, Developmental psychology, Child development, Test (biology), Pediatrics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Second Edition and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development with Premature Infants — Research Paper | ScholarLens