Resection of Malignant Bone Tumors of the Pelvic Girdle Without Extremity Amputation
James F. Huth
Abstract
James F. Huth
Abstract
Fifty-three patients with malignant tumors of the pelvis ossea were evaluated for location of tumor, extent of resection, postoperative function, local recurrence, and survival. Three tumors were unresectable, 17 required a wide local excision, 27 required resection of the hemipelvis without extremity amputation (internal hemipelvectomy), and six required a classical hemipelvectomy with amputation. The incidence of local recurrence was 11.8% for wide local excision, 7.4% for internal hemipelvectomy, and 33% for classical hemipelvectomy. Survival following wide local excision or internal hemipelvectomy was 58% and 41%, respectively, at five years compared with 17% for patients undergoing classical hemipelvectomy. Patients who underwent wide local excision had good to excellent functional results. Patients requiring internal hemipelvectomy initially required ambulatory supports, but many can now ambulate independently, with a neurologically intact extremity, despite a noticeably abnormal gait.
OpenAlex reports 52 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Fifty-three patients with malignant tumors of the pelvis ossea were evaluated for location of tumor, extent of resection, postoperative function, local recurrence, and survival. Three tumors were unresectable, 17 required a wide local excision, 27 required resection of the hemipelvis without extremity amputation (internal hemipelvectomy), and six required a classical hemipelvectomy with amputation. The incidence of local recurrence was 11.8% for wide local excision, 7.4% for internal hemipelvectomy, and 33% for classical hemipelvectomy. Survival following wide local excision or internal hemipelvectomy was 58% and 41%, respectively, at five years compared with 17% for patients undergoing classical hemipelvectomy. Patients who underwent wide local excision had good to excellent functional results. Patients requiring internal hemipelvectomy initially required ambulatory supports, but many can now ambulate independently, with a neurologically intact extremity, despite a noticeably abnormal gait.
Key concepts: Hemipelvectomy, Medicine, Surgery, Amputation, Pelvis, Sarcoma, Resection, Pathology