2011Unpublished venueRequires access

A comparison and analysis of congestion window for HS-TCP, Full-TCP, and TCP-Linux in long term evolution system model

Ghassan A. Abed, Mahamod Ismail, Kasmiran Jumari

Open publisher page 41 citations

Abstract

TCP performance over high bandwidth network still represents the major challenge, since the large numbers of data flows through bottleneck, TCP forces a high packet loss rate and that causing delays that users are likely to notice. Congestion window (cwnd) is maintained, which indicates the number of Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) segments that the existing connection is capable of holding safely. In high bandwidth networks, such as 4thGeneration (4G) Long Term Evolution (LTE) systems, we expect a high rate of traffics, and then each TCP variants perform a different behavior of cwnd. In this study, three TCP's variants: TCP-Linux, FullTCP, and High Speed TCP (HSTCP), observed and the cwnd of each variant analyzed and compared with other two variants, over a model of high bandwidth network topology using network simulator (NS-2). All these TCP's tested under high rate of data transferred through a bottleneck. We found that each variant can provide a good cwnd size performance and stability but the differences was in cwnd phases such as slow start threshold (ssthresh), congestion avoidance, slow-start, and maximum congestion points.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

TCP performance over high bandwidth network still represents the major challenge, since the large numbers of data flows through bottleneck, TCP forces a high packet loss rate and that causing delays that users are likely to notice. Congestion window (cwnd) is maintained, which indicates the number of Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) segments that the existing connection is capable of holding safely. In high bandwidth networks, such as 4thGeneration (4G) Long Term Evolution (LTE) systems, we expect a high rate of traffics, and then each TCP variants perform a different behavior of cwnd. In this study, three TCP's variants: TCP-Linux, FullTCP, and High Speed TCP (HSTCP), observed and the cwnd of each variant analyzed and compared with other two variants, over a model of high bandwidth network topology using network simulator (NS-2). All these TCP's tested under high rate of data transferred through a bottleneck. We found that each variant can provide a good cwnd size performance and stability but the differences was in cwnd phases such as slow start threshold (ssthresh), congestion avoidance, slow-start, and maximum congestion points.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 41 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

TCP performance over high bandwidth network still represents the major challenge, since the large numbers of data flows through bottleneck, TCP forces a high packet loss rate and that causing delays that users are likely to notice. Congestion window (cwnd) is maintained, which indicates the number of Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) segments that the existing connection is capable of holding safely. In high bandwidth networks, such as 4thGeneration (4G) Long Term Evolution (LTE) systems, we expect a high rate of traffics, and then each TCP variants perform a different behavior of cwnd. In this study, three TCP's variants: TCP-Linux, FullTCP, and High Speed TCP (HSTCP), observed and the cwnd of each variant analyzed and compared with other two variants, over a model of high bandwidth network topology using network simulator (NS-2). All these TCP's tested under high rate of data transferred through a bottleneck. We found that each variant can provide a good cwnd size performance and stability but the differences was in cwnd phases such as slow start threshold (ssthresh), congestion avoidance, slow-start, and maximum congestion points.

Key concepts: TCP Westwood plus, TCP global synchronization, H-TCP, CUBIC TCP, Computer network, TCP Friendly Rate Control, TCP Westwood, TCP tuning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparison and analysis of congestion window for HS-TCP, Full-TCP, and TCP-Linux in long term evolution system model — Research Paper | ScholarLens