2010•Unpublished venueRequires access

Foundations of data interoperability on the web

Hamid Haidarian Shahri

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

In this paper, when we use the term ontology, we are primarily referring to linked data in the form of RDF(S). The problem of ontology mapping has attracted considerable attention over the last few years, as the deployment of ontologies is increasing with the advent of the Web of Data. We identify two sharply distinct goals for ontology mapping, based on real-world use cases. These goals are: (i) ontology development, and (ii) facilitating interoperability. We systematically analyze the goals, side-by-side, and contrast them for the first time. Our analysis demonstrates the implications of the goals on ontology mapping and mapping representation. Many studies on ontology mapping have focused on ontology merging. Ontology merging is an ontology development task (goal i). With the increase in the number of web-based information systems that utilize ontologies, the need for facilitating interoperability between these systems is becoming more visible (goal ii).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper, when we use the term ontology, we are primarily referring to linked data in the form of RDF(S). The problem of ontology mapping has attracted considerable attention over the last few years, as the deployment of ontologies is increasing with the advent of the Web of Data. We identify two sharply distinct goals for ontology mapping, based on real-world use cases. These goals are: (i) ontology development, and (ii) facilitating interoperability. We systematically analyze the goals, side-by-side, and contrast them for the first time. Our analysis demonstrates the implications of the goals on ontology mapping and mapping representation. Many studies on ontology mapping have focused on ontology merging. Ontology merging is an ontology development task (goal i). With the increase in the number of web-based information systems that utilize ontologies, the need for facilitating interoperability between these systems is becoming more visible (goal ii).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper, when we use the term ontology, we are primarily referring to linked data in the form of RDF(S). The problem of ontology mapping has attracted considerable attention over the last few years, as the deployment of ontologies is increasing with the advent of the Web of Data. We identify two sharply distinct goals for ontology mapping, based on real-world use cases. These goals are: (i) ontology development, and (ii) facilitating interoperability. We systematically analyze the goals, side-by-side, and contrast them for the first time. Our analysis demonstrates the implications of the goals on ontology mapping and mapping representation. Many studies on ontology mapping have focused on ontology merging. Ontology merging is an ontology development task (goal i). With the increase in the number of web-based information systems that utilize ontologies, the need for facilitating interoperability between these systems is becoming more visible (goal ii).

Key concepts: Ontology, Computer science, Ontology-based data integration, Upper ontology, Process ontology, Interoperability, Suggested Upper Merged Ontology, Open Biomedical Ontologies

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Foundations of data interoperability on the web — Research Paper | ScholarLens