2012DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Open access

EFFECT OF HAND AND CHEMICAL THINNING ON YIELDING AND FRUIT QUALITY OF TWO LATE - RIPENING PLUM CULTIVARS

I. Sosna

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

Excessive amount of fruits on a tree results in loss of their weight. An advantageous way of improving the quality of e.g. plums is thinning their fruitlets. The experiment involving this problem was conducted in the years 2003–2005 at the Fruit Experimental Station in Samotwór near Wrocław. The subject of investigation were 10-year-old plum trees of two cultivars – ‘Valor’ and ‘President’, growing on a ‘Myrobalan’ rootstock (Prunus divaricata) in the spacing of 4 × 3 m (833 trees./ha). In the course of three subsequent years fruitlets were hand thinned one and two month after full blooming, as well as chemically treated, using the following preparations: Pomonit R-10 (NAA) + Ethrel (ethephon) and exclusively with Ethrel (14–10 days after trees blooming respectively). As a control there served trees which did not undergo fruitlets thinning. Hand thinning increased mean weight of ‘President’ fruits, while in ‘Valor’ cv. the same dependence was observed only when the treatment took place later. Chemical thinning did not significantly affect on fruit yield quality. In both plum cultivars, fruits obtained from not thinned trees characterized similar content of soluble solids and mineral components to those produced after application of hand and chemical thinning.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Excessive amount of fruits on a tree results in loss of their weight. An advantageous way of improving the quality of e.g. plums is thinning their fruitlets. The experiment involving this problem was conducted in the years 2003–2005 at the Fruit Experimental Station in Samotwór near Wrocław. The subject of investigation were 10-year-old plum trees of two cultivars – ‘Valor’ and ‘President’, growing on a ‘Myrobalan’ rootstock (Prunus divaricata) in the spacing of 4 × 3 m (833 trees./ha). In the course of three subsequent years fruitlets were hand thinned one and two month after full blooming, as well as chemically treated, using the following preparations: Pomonit R-10 (NAA) + Ethrel (ethephon) and exclusively with Ethrel (14–10 days after trees blooming respectively). As a control there served trees which did not undergo fruitlets thinning. Hand thinning increased mean weight of ‘President’ fruits, while in ‘Valor’ cv. the same dependence was observed only when the treatment took place later. Chemical thinning did not significantly affect on fruit yield quality. In both plum cultivars, fruits obtained from not thinned trees characterized similar content of soluble solids and mineral components to those produced after application of hand and chemical thinning.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Excessive amount of fruits on a tree results in loss of their weight. An advantageous way of improving the quality of e.g. plums is thinning their fruitlets. The experiment involving this problem was conducted in the years 2003–2005 at the Fruit Experimental Station in Samotwór near Wrocław. The subject of investigation were 10-year-old plum trees of two cultivars – ‘Valor’ and ‘President’, growing on a ‘Myrobalan’ rootstock (Prunus divaricata) in the spacing of 4 × 3 m (833 trees./ha). In the course of three subsequent years fruitlets were hand thinned one and two month after full blooming, as well as chemically treated, using the following preparations: Pomonit R-10 (NAA) + Ethrel (ethephon) and exclusively with Ethrel (14–10 days after trees blooming respectively). As a control there served trees which did not undergo fruitlets thinning. Hand thinning increased mean weight of ‘President’ fruits, while in ‘Valor’ cv. the same dependence was observed only when the treatment took place later. Chemical thinning did not significantly affect on fruit yield quality. In both plum cultivars, fruits obtained from not thinned trees characterized similar content of soluble solids and mineral components to those produced after application of hand and chemical thinning.

Key concepts: Thinning, Ethephon, Ripening, Cultivar, Horticulture, Rootstock, Prunus, Yield (engineering)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EFFECT OF HAND AND CHEMICAL THINNING ON YIELDING AND FRUIT QUALITY OF TWO LATE - RIPENING PLUM CULTIVARS — Research Paper | ScholarLens