2012•PubMedRequires access

Outcome of in vitro fertilization in endometriosis-associated infertility: a 5-year database cohort study.

Xiao-Na Lin, Minling Wei, Xiao-Mei Tong, Weihai Xu, Feng Zhou, Qiongxiao Huang, Guo-Feng Wen, Songying Zhang

Open publisher page 47 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis affects natural fertility through various approaches, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) is a good treatment. But the IVF result of endometriosis patients is still under debate. We investigated the effect of endometriosis on IVF by analyzing the data from a single reproductive center. METHODS: A retrospective, database-searched cohort study was performed. Relevant information was collected from the electronic records of women who underwent IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection between January 2006 and December 2010 in the Assisted Reproductive Unit of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. Patients with endometriosis were enrolled the study group. The rest of the women formed the control group. The main outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes were oocytes retrieved number, fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, number of high-quality embryo for embryo transplantation, and implantation embryo/high-quality embryo ratio (IE/HQE ratio). Comparisons were performed by the c(2)-test and independent t-test. RESULTS: The endometriosis group (n = 177) had a markedly lower oocytes retrieved number, fertilization rate, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate (7.6 ± 5.1, 63.6%, 27.7%, and 45.2%, respectively) compared with the non-endometriosis group (n = 4267; 11.8 ± 7.3, 68.4%, 36.2%, and 55.2%, respectively). Stratified analysis showed that this difference was found in the subgroup younger than 35-years old, while only fertilization rate and implantation rate were different in the elder subgroup. The ratio of high-quality embryos transferred is lower in endometriosis group (53.7% vs. 71.8%, P < 0.05), but there is no difference in IE/HQE ratio between two groups. There is no significant difference in fertilization rate, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate between mild and severe endometriosis patients. CONCLUSIONS: Endometriosis patients suffer a decreasing IVF pregnancy rates mainly caused by reducing oocytes number and fertilization rate, regardless of the severity of the disease. Appropriate intracytoplasmic sperm injection manipulation might improve the outcomes of IVF.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis affects natural fertility through various approaches, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) is a good treatment. But the IVF result of endometriosis patients is still under debate. We investigated the effect of endometriosis on IVF by analyzing the data from a single reproductive center. METHODS: A retrospective, database-searched cohort study was performed. Relevant information was collected from the electronic records of women who underwent IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection between January 2006 and December 2010 in the Assisted Reproductive Unit of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. Patients with endometriosis were enrolled the study group. The rest of the women formed the control group. The main outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes were oocytes retrieved number, fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, number of high-quality embryo for embryo transplantation, and implantation embryo/high-quality embryo ratio (IE/HQE ratio). Comparisons were performed by the c(2)-test and independent t-test. RESULTS: The endometriosis group (n = 177) had a markedly lower oocytes retrieved number, fertilization rate, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate (7.6 ± 5.1, 63.6%, 27.7%, and 45.2%, respectively) compared with the non-endometriosis group (n = 4267; 11.8 ± 7.3, 68.4%, 36.2%, and 55.2%, respectively). Stratified analysis showed that this difference was found in the subgroup younger than 35-years old, while only fertilization rate and implantation rate were different in the elder subgroup. The ratio of high-quality embryos transferred is lower in endometriosis group (53.7% vs. 71.8%, P < 0.05), but there is no difference in IE/HQE ratio between two groups. There is no significant difference in fertilization rate, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate between mild and severe endometriosis patients. CONCLUSIONS: Endometriosis patients suffer a decreasing IVF pregnancy rates mainly caused by reducing oocytes number and fertilization rate, regardless of the severity of the disease. Appropriate intracytoplasmic sperm injection manipulation might improve the outcomes of IVF.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 47 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis affects natural fertility through various approaches, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) is a good treatment. But the IVF result of endometriosis patients is still under debate. We investigated the effect of endometriosis on IVF by analyzing the data from a single reproductive center. METHODS: A retrospective, database-searched cohort study was performed. Relevant information was collected from the electronic records of women who underwent IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection between January 2006 and December 2010 in the Assisted Reproductive Unit of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. Patients with endometriosis were enrolled the study group. The rest of the women formed the control group. The main outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes were oocytes retrieved number, fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, number of high-quality embryo for embryo transplantation, and implantation embryo/high-quality embryo ratio (IE/HQE ratio). Comparisons were performed by the c(2)-test and independent t-test. RESULTS: The endometriosis group (n = 177) had a markedly lower oocytes retrieved number, fertilization rate, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate (7.6 ± 5.1, 63.6%, 27.7%, and 45.2%, respectively) compared with the non-endometriosis group (n = 4267; 11.8 ± 7.3, 68.4%, 36.2%, and 55.2%, respectively). Stratified analysis showed that this difference was found in the subgroup younger than 35-years old, while only fertilization rate and implantation rate were different in the elder subgroup. The ratio of high-quality embryos transferred is lower in endometriosis group (53.7% vs. 71.8%, P < 0.05), but there is no difference in IE/HQE ratio between two groups. There is no significant difference in fertilization rate, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate between mild and severe endometriosis patients. CONCLUSIONS: Endometriosis patients suffer a decreasing IVF pregnancy rates mainly caused by reducing oocytes number and fertilization rate, regardless of the severity of the disease. Appropriate intracytoplasmic sperm injection manipulation might improve the outcomes of IVF.

Key concepts: Endometriosis, Infertility, Medicine, In vitro fertilisation, Pregnancy rate, Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Gynecology, Embryo transfer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Outcome of in vitro fertilization in endometriosis-associated infertility: a 5-year database cohort study. — Research Paper | ScholarLens