1977Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical EngineersRequires access

Comparison of alternative formulations of 3-dimensional magnetic-field and eddy-current problems at power frequencies

C.J. Carpenter

Open publisher page 169 citations

Abstract

The numerical calculation of 3-dimensional eddy currents is complicated by the need to use vector functions to describe the interlinked flux and current distributions. The three vector components are coupled, particularly by the conditions imposed by the copper and iron surfaces, and by other changes in material properties. The range of choice of magnetic and electric vector potentials is examined, including the ξ and H vectors as particular examples, and it is shown that the problem formulation is greatly affected by the choice of gauge, or vector-potential divergence. This introduces scalar potentials which can be used in various ways. They control the coupling conditions between the vector components. One advantage of an electric vector potential, or generalised H, formulation is that the gauge can be chosen so that the vector is zero outside the conductors, and is replaced by a scalar. Magnetic vector-potential formulations are generally less attractive, both because the vector has to be computed throughout the region of interest and because of the greater complexity of the magnetic-and electric-interface conditions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The numerical calculation of 3-dimensional eddy currents is complicated by the need to use vector functions to describe the interlinked flux and current distributions. The three vector components are coupled, particularly by the conditions imposed by the copper and iron surfaces, and by other changes in material properties. The range of choice of magnetic and electric vector potentials is examined, including the ξ and H vectors as particular examples, and it is shown that the problem formulation is greatly affected by the choice of gauge, or vector-potential divergence. This introduces scalar potentials which can be used in various ways. They control the coupling conditions between the vector components. One advantage of an electric vector potential, or generalised H, formulation is that the gauge can be chosen so that the vector is zero outside the conductors, and is replaced by a scalar. Magnetic vector-potential formulations are generally less attractive, both because the vector has to be computed throughout the region of interest and because of the greater complexity of the magnetic-and electric-interface conditions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 169 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The numerical calculation of 3-dimensional eddy currents is complicated by the need to use vector functions to describe the interlinked flux and current distributions. The three vector components are coupled, particularly by the conditions imposed by the copper and iron surfaces, and by other changes in material properties. The range of choice of magnetic and electric vector potentials is examined, including the ξ and H vectors as particular examples, and it is shown that the problem formulation is greatly affected by the choice of gauge, or vector-potential divergence. This introduces scalar potentials which can be used in various ways. They control the coupling conditions between the vector components. One advantage of an electric vector potential, or generalised H, formulation is that the gauge can be chosen so that the vector is zero outside the conductors, and is replaced by a scalar. Magnetic vector-potential formulations are generally less attractive, both because the vector has to be computed throughout the region of interest and because of the greater complexity of the magnetic-and electric-interface conditions.

Key concepts: Vector potential, Magnetic potential, Scalar (mathematics), Scalar potential, Electrical conductor, Eddy current, Physics, Divergence (linguistics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of alternative formulations of 3-dimensional magnetic-field and eddy-current problems at power frequencies — Research Paper | ScholarLens