Prey size selection, grazing and growth response of the small heterotrophic dinoflagellate Gymnodinium sp. and the ciliate Balanion comatum--a comparative study
Hans Jakobsen, Per Juel Hansen
Abstract
Open-access reader
Hans Jakobsen, Per Juel Hansen
Abstract
Open-access reader
Prey selectivity, growth and feeding responses were studied in the cillate Balanion comaturn (17 pm) and the heterotroph~c dinoflagellate Gjmnodinium sp.(7 pm).Almost identical prey size spectra were found for the 2 organisms.Optimum prey size was 8 pm, while the lower and upper hmits of prey capture were -4 and 10 pm, respectively.Maximum growth and ingestion rates of B. comatum were slightly higher than those of Gj~mnodinium sp.Threshold prey concentration for growth of B. comatum and Gymnodinium sp. was 11 and 17 pg C I-', respectively.At 15"C, both organisms needed to ingest approx. 1 to 2 % h-' of their cell volume in order to sustain basic metabolic actlvlty.M a x ~m u m specific clearance was 2 to 3 tlmes h ~g h e r for the ciliate compared to the dinoflagellate.Gymnodlnium sp.survived for a longer time than B. comatum when deprived of prey organisms.Gymnodinium sp. cells were not ingested by B. comatum, although they were of a size which is optimal for B. comatum.
OpenAlex reports 134 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Prey selectivity, growth and feeding responses were studied in the cillate Balanion comaturn (17 pm) and the heterotroph~c dinoflagellate Gjmnodinium sp.(7 pm).Almost identical prey size spectra were found for the 2 organisms.Optimum prey size was 8 pm, while the lower and upper hmits of prey capture were -4 and 10 pm, respectively.Maximum growth and ingestion rates of B. comatum were slightly higher than those of Gj~mnodinium sp.Threshold prey concentration for growth of B. comatum and Gymnodinium sp. was 11 and 17 pg C I-', respectively.At 15"C, both organisms needed to ingest approx. 1 to 2 % h-' of their cell volume in order to sustain basic metabolic actlvlty.M a x ~m u m specific clearance was 2 to 3 tlmes h ~g h e r for the ciliate compared to the dinoflagellate.Gymnodlnium sp.survived for a longer time than B. comatum when deprived of prey organisms.Gymnodinium sp. cells were not ingested by B. comatum, although they were of a size which is optimal for B. comatum.
Key concepts: Dinoflagellate, Gymnodinium, Ciliate, Biology, Predation, Red tide, Ecology, Zoology