1984Journal of Soil ScienceRequires access

Iron oxide mineralogy of placic horizons

Alistair S. Campbell, Udo Schwertmann

Open publisher page 108 citations

Abstract

SUMMARY The iron oxide mineralogy of 15 placic horizons from Germany, New Zealand, Belgium and U.K. was determined by differential X‐ray diffraction (DXRD). All samples examined contained ferrihydrite and goethite, lepidocrocite occurred in 10, and six contained non‐DCB‐reducible, lithogenic hematite. Ferrihydrite was most readily identified in ‘untreated minus oxalate‐treated’ DXRD patterns. Al‐substitution of goethites ranged from 4 to 13 mole %. Mean crystallite dimensions varied from 11 to 21 nm and from 6 to 21 nm for the goethite (110) and (111) lines respectively, from 7 to 51 nm for the lepidocrocite (020) line (lath thickness), and from 55 to 134 nm for the hematite (104) line. These values are typical for goethites from carbon‐rich environments with poor crystallization conditions, and for well crystalline lithogenic hematites. The DXRD method is ideally suited to the evaluation of the many selective dissolution techniques used in soil chemistry and mineralogy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SUMMARY The iron oxide mineralogy of 15 placic horizons from Germany, New Zealand, Belgium and U.K. was determined by differential X‐ray diffraction (DXRD). All samples examined contained ferrihydrite and goethite, lepidocrocite occurred in 10, and six contained non‐DCB‐reducible, lithogenic hematite. Ferrihydrite was most readily identified in ‘untreated minus oxalate‐treated’ DXRD patterns. Al‐substitution of goethites ranged from 4 to 13 mole %. Mean crystallite dimensions varied from 11 to 21 nm and from 6 to 21 nm for the goethite (110) and (111) lines respectively, from 7 to 51 nm for the lepidocrocite (020) line (lath thickness), and from 55 to 134 nm for the hematite (104) line. These values are typical for goethites from carbon‐rich environments with poor crystallization conditions, and for well crystalline lithogenic hematites. The DXRD method is ideally suited to the evaluation of the many selective dissolution techniques used in soil chemistry and mineralogy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 108 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SUMMARY The iron oxide mineralogy of 15 placic horizons from Germany, New Zealand, Belgium and U.K. was determined by differential X‐ray diffraction (DXRD). All samples examined contained ferrihydrite and goethite, lepidocrocite occurred in 10, and six contained non‐DCB‐reducible, lithogenic hematite. Ferrihydrite was most readily identified in ‘untreated minus oxalate‐treated’ DXRD patterns. Al‐substitution of goethites ranged from 4 to 13 mole %. Mean crystallite dimensions varied from 11 to 21 nm and from 6 to 21 nm for the goethite (110) and (111) lines respectively, from 7 to 51 nm for the lepidocrocite (020) line (lath thickness), and from 55 to 134 nm for the hematite (104) line. These values are typical for goethites from carbon‐rich environments with poor crystallization conditions, and for well crystalline lithogenic hematites. The DXRD method is ideally suited to the evaluation of the many selective dissolution techniques used in soil chemistry and mineralogy.

Key concepts: Lepidocrocite, Goethite, Ferrihydrite, Hematite, Iron oxide, Mineralogy, Oxide, Crystallite

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Iron oxide mineralogy of placic horizons — Research Paper | ScholarLens