Cristy A. Jensen, Richard Krolak, Anne C. Cowden
Abstract
A complementary dichotomy has evolved in federal‐state relations because of Reagan's “New Federalism.” States have become “activists” as they adopt national policies to state objectives. Simultaneously, new constraints on spending have made them “captives” to national priorities.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A complementary dichotomy has evolved in federal‐state relations because of Reagan's “New Federalism.” States have become “activists” as they adopt national policies to state objectives. Simultaneously, new constraints on spending have made them “captives” to national priorities.
Key concepts: Federalism, State (computer science), Public administration, Political science, Cooperative federalism, Law and economics, Political economy, Law