Determination of Geometric Standard Deviation for Dissolution
N. R. Bohidar
Abstract
N. R. Bohidar
Abstract
The two important instances in which the scientist converts his/her experimental data to a logarithmic scale prior to computing the mean and standard deviation, are (i) when the distribution of the data is asymmetrical (e.g. percentage data) and (ii) when he/she intends to compare statistically the averages of two or more groups with unequal standard deviations. In either case, the mean is restored to its original scale by taking the antilog of the log mean, which is the geometric mean. However, this procedure cannot be applied for computing the geometric standard deviation. The author of reference(l) erroneously claims that the antilog of log standard deviation is the geometric standard deviation. This paper demonstrates the incorrectness of the procedure in reference (1), exhibits the exact statistical formula and introduces a novel method called “jackknife statistic” to confirm the results, based on the dissolution data associated with Product-C.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The two important instances in which the scientist converts his/her experimental data to a logarithmic scale prior to computing the mean and standard deviation, are (i) when the distribution of the data is asymmetrical (e.g. percentage data) and (ii) when he/she intends to compare statistically the averages of two or more groups with unequal standard deviations. In either case, the mean is restored to its original scale by taking the antilog of the log mean, which is the geometric mean. However, this procedure cannot be applied for computing the geometric standard deviation. The author of reference(l) erroneously claims that the antilog of log standard deviation is the geometric standard deviation. This paper demonstrates the incorrectness of the procedure in reference (1), exhibits the exact statistical formula and introduces a novel method called “jackknife statistic” to confirm the results, based on the dissolution data associated with Product-C.
Key concepts: Geometric standard deviation, Standard deviation, Geometric mean, Studentized range, Mathematics, Jackknife resampling, Relative standard deviation, Statistics