2005IEICE Transactions on Information and SystemsRequires access

Inherent Ambiguity of Languages Generated by Spine Grammars

Ikuo Kawaharada

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

There have been many arguments that the underlying structure of natural languages is beyond the descriptive capacity of context-free languages. A well-known example is tree adjoining grammars; less common are spine grammars, linear indexed grammars, head grammars, and combinatory categorial grammars. It is known that these models of grammars have the same generative power of string languages and fall into the class of mildly context-sensitive grammars. For an automaton, it is known that the class of languages accepted by transfer pushdown automata is exactly the class of linear indexed languages. In this paper, deterministic transfer pushdown automata is introduced. We will show that the language accepted by a deterministic transfer pushdown automaton is generated by an unambiguous spine grammar. Moreover, we will show that there exists an inherently ambiguous language.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There have been many arguments that the underlying structure of natural languages is beyond the descriptive capacity of context-free languages. A well-known example is tree adjoining grammars; less common are spine grammars, linear indexed grammars, head grammars, and combinatory categorial grammars. It is known that these models of grammars have the same generative power of string languages and fall into the class of mildly context-sensitive grammars. For an automaton, it is known that the class of languages accepted by transfer pushdown automata is exactly the class of linear indexed languages. In this paper, deterministic transfer pushdown automata is introduced. We will show that the language accepted by a deterministic transfer pushdown automaton is generated by an unambiguous spine grammar. Moreover, we will show that there exists an inherently ambiguous language.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There have been many arguments that the underlying structure of natural languages is beyond the descriptive capacity of context-free languages. A well-known example is tree adjoining grammars; less common are spine grammars, linear indexed grammars, head grammars, and combinatory categorial grammars. It is known that these models of grammars have the same generative power of string languages and fall into the class of mildly context-sensitive grammars. For an automaton, it is known that the class of languages accepted by transfer pushdown automata is exactly the class of linear indexed languages. In this paper, deterministic transfer pushdown automata is introduced. We will show that the language accepted by a deterministic transfer pushdown automaton is generated by an unambiguous spine grammar. Moreover, we will show that there exists an inherently ambiguous language.

Key concepts: Embedded pushdown automaton, Deterministic context-free grammar, Tree-adjoining grammar, Indexed grammar, Context-sensitive grammar, Computer science, L-attributed grammar, Phrase structure grammar

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Inherent Ambiguity of Languages Generated by Spine Grammars — Research Paper | ScholarLens