2014•Journal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthRequires access

Observations of static Coulomb stress triggering of the November 2011M5.7 Oklahoma earthquake sequence

D. F. Sumy, Elizabeth S. Cochran, Katie M. Keranen, Maya Wei, G. A. Abers

Open publisher page 207 citations

Abstract

Abstract In November 2011, aM5.0 earthquake occurred less than a day before aM5.7 earthquake near Prague, Oklahoma, which may have promoted failure of the mainshock and thousands of aftershocks along the Wilzetta fault, including aM5.0 aftershock. TheM5.0 foreshock occurred in close proximity to active fluid injection wells; fluid injection can cause a buildup of pore fluid pressure, decrease the fault strength, and may induce earthquakes.Keranen et al. [ ] links theM5.0 foreshock with fluid injection, but the relationship between the foreshock and successive events has not been investigated. Here we examine the role of coseismic Coulomb stress transfer on earthquakes that follow theM5.0 foreshock, including theM5.7 mainshock. We resolve the static Coulomb stress change onto the focal mechanism nodal plane that is most consistent with the rupture geometry of the threeM ≥ 5.0 earthquakes, as well as specified receiver fault planes that reflect the regional stress orientation. We find that Coulomb stress is increased, e.g., fault failure is promoted, on the nodal planes of ~60% of the events that have focal mechanism solutions, and more specifically, that theM5.0 foreshock promoted failure on the rupture plane of theM5.7 mainshock. We test our results over a range of effective coefficient of friction values. Hence, we argue that theM5.0 foreshock, induced by fluid injection, potentially triggered a cascading failure of earthquakes along the complex Wilzetta fault system.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In November 2011, aM5.0 earthquake occurred less than a day before aM5.7 earthquake near Prague, Oklahoma, which may have promoted failure of the mainshock and thousands of aftershocks along the Wilzetta fault, including aM5.0 aftershock. TheM5.0 foreshock occurred in close proximity to active fluid injection wells; fluid injection can cause a buildup of pore fluid pressure, decrease the fault strength, and may induce earthquakes.Keranen et al. [ ] links theM5.0 foreshock with fluid injection, but the relationship between the foreshock and successive events has not been investigated. Here we examine the role of coseismic Coulomb stress transfer on earthquakes that follow theM5.0 foreshock, including theM5.7 mainshock. We resolve the static Coulomb stress change onto the focal mechanism nodal plane that is most consistent with the rupture geometry of the threeM ≥ 5.0 earthquakes, as well as specified receiver fault planes that reflect the regional stress orientation. We find that Coulomb stress is increased, e.g., fault failure is promoted, on the nodal planes of ~60% of the events that have focal mechanism solutions, and more specifically, that theM5.0 foreshock promoted failure on the rupture plane of theM5.7 mainshock. We test our results over a range of effective coefficient of friction values. Hence, we argue that theM5.0 foreshock, induced by fluid injection, potentially triggered a cascading failure of earthquakes along the complex Wilzetta fault system.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 207 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In November 2011, aM5.0 earthquake occurred less than a day before aM5.7 earthquake near Prague, Oklahoma, which may have promoted failure of the mainshock and thousands of aftershocks along the Wilzetta fault, including aM5.0 aftershock. TheM5.0 foreshock occurred in close proximity to active fluid injection wells; fluid injection can cause a buildup of pore fluid pressure, decrease the fault strength, and may induce earthquakes.Keranen et al. [ ] links theM5.0 foreshock with fluid injection, but the relationship between the foreshock and successive events has not been investigated. Here we examine the role of coseismic Coulomb stress transfer on earthquakes that follow theM5.0 foreshock, including theM5.7 mainshock. We resolve the static Coulomb stress change onto the focal mechanism nodal plane that is most consistent with the rupture geometry of the threeM ≥ 5.0 earthquakes, as well as specified receiver fault planes that reflect the regional stress orientation. We find that Coulomb stress is increased, e.g., fault failure is promoted, on the nodal planes of ~60% of the events that have focal mechanism solutions, and more specifically, that theM5.0 foreshock promoted failure on the rupture plane of theM5.7 mainshock. We test our results over a range of effective coefficient of friction values. Hence, we argue that theM5.0 foreshock, induced by fluid injection, potentially triggered a cascading failure of earthquakes along the complex Wilzetta fault system.

Key concepts: Foreshock, Aftershock, Seismology, Geology, Fault plane, Focal mechanism, Fault (geology), Coulomb

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Observations of static Coulomb stress triggering of the November 2011M5.7 Oklahoma earthquake sequence — Research Paper | ScholarLens