1979•17th Aerospace Sciences MeetingRequires access

Numerical comparisons of panel methods at subsonic and supersonic speeds

James Lawrence Thomas, David Scott Miller

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

Numerical comparisons between some recently developed surface panel methods and well-established methods are made to assess their accuracy at subsonic and supersonic speeds. The results at subsonic speeds indicate similar improvements for the methods investigated over the low order source method. At supersonic speeds, stable and accurate results were obtained with the surface panel methods. Significant differences between tangential mass flux and tangential velocity boundary conditions occurred, especially at low fineness ratios and higher Mach numbers. The advantages of the general source/doublet panel formulation at both subsonic and supersonic speeds are noted.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Numerical comparisons between some recently developed surface panel methods and well-established methods are made to assess their accuracy at subsonic and supersonic speeds. The results at subsonic speeds indicate similar improvements for the methods investigated over the low order source method. At supersonic speeds, stable and accurate results were obtained with the surface panel methods. Significant differences between tangential mass flux and tangential velocity boundary conditions occurred, especially at low fineness ratios and higher Mach numbers. The advantages of the general source/doublet panel formulation at both subsonic and supersonic speeds are noted.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Numerical comparisons between some recently developed surface panel methods and well-established methods are made to assess their accuracy at subsonic and supersonic speeds. The results at subsonic speeds indicate similar improvements for the methods investigated over the low order source method. At supersonic speeds, stable and accurate results were obtained with the surface panel methods. Significant differences between tangential mass flux and tangential velocity boundary conditions occurred, especially at low fineness ratios and higher Mach numbers. The advantages of the general source/doublet panel formulation at both subsonic and supersonic speeds are noted.

Key concepts: Supersonic speed, Mach number, Mechanics, Choked flow, Aerodynamics, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Numerical comparisons of panel methods at subsonic and supersonic speeds — Research Paper | ScholarLens