1982Journal of Applied ToxicologyRequires access

Comparison of somatic and germ cell models for cytogenetic screening

Henry E. Holden

Open publisher page 59 citations

Abstract

A variety of in vivo mammalian test models are available for screening of chemicals for mutagenicity at the chromosomal level. These models have been grouped into those focusing on somatic cell effects and those dealing with germ cell effects. An analysis of available literature indicates that 76 compounds have been tested from chromosome effects in both somatic and germ cells. Of these, concordant results (positive-positive or negative-negative) were obtained with 58 compounds. Of the remaining 18 compounds with discordant results, all were positive in somatic cells, but negative in germ cell assays. These results suggest an inherent relative insensitivity of germ cells themselves to mutagenic chemicals. In the context of screening for safety evaluation purposes, this analysis suggests that a negative somatic-cell response can be taken as highly predictive of negative results in a germ cell assessment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A variety of in vivo mammalian test models are available for screening of chemicals for mutagenicity at the chromosomal level. These models have been grouped into those focusing on somatic cell effects and those dealing with germ cell effects. An analysis of available literature indicates that 76 compounds have been tested from chromosome effects in both somatic and germ cells. Of these, concordant results (positive-positive or negative-negative) were obtained with 58 compounds. Of the remaining 18 compounds with discordant results, all were positive in somatic cells, but negative in germ cell assays. These results suggest an inherent relative insensitivity of germ cells themselves to mutagenic chemicals. In the context of screening for safety evaluation purposes, this analysis suggests that a negative somatic-cell response can be taken as highly predictive of negative results in a germ cell assessment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 59 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A variety of in vivo mammalian test models are available for screening of chemicals for mutagenicity at the chromosomal level. These models have been grouped into those focusing on somatic cell effects and those dealing with germ cell effects. An analysis of available literature indicates that 76 compounds have been tested from chromosome effects in both somatic and germ cells. Of these, concordant results (positive-positive or negative-negative) were obtained with 58 compounds. Of the remaining 18 compounds with discordant results, all were positive in somatic cells, but negative in germ cell assays. These results suggest an inherent relative insensitivity of germ cells themselves to mutagenic chemicals. In the context of screening for safety evaluation purposes, this analysis suggests that a negative somatic-cell response can be taken as highly predictive of negative results in a germ cell assessment.

Key concepts: Somatic cell, Germ cell, Biology, Context (archaeology), Germ, Genetics, Germline, Cell

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of somatic and germ cell models for cytogenetic screening — Research Paper | ScholarLens