1998Journal of the American Statistical AssociationRequires access

An Intrinsic Limiting Procedure for Model Selection and Hypotheses Testing

Elı́as Moreno, Francesco Bertolino, Walter Racugno

Open publisher page 134 citations

Abstract

Improper priors typically arise in default Bayesian estimation problems. In the Bayesian approach to model selection or hypothesis testing, the main tool is the Bayes factor. When improper priors for the parameters appearing in the models are used, the Bayes factor is not well defined. The intrinsic Bayes factor introduced by Berger and Pericchi is an interesting method for overcoming that difficulty. That method is of particular interest as a means for generating proper prior distributions (intrinsic priors) for model comparison from the improper priors typically used in estimation. The goal of this article is to develop a limiting procedure that provides a solid justification for the use of Bayes factor with intrinsic priors. The procedure is formalized and discussed for nested and nonnested models. Illustrations and comparisons with other approximations to Bayes factors, such as the Bayesian information criterion of Schwarz and the fractional Bayes factor of O'Hagan are provided.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Improper priors typically arise in default Bayesian estimation problems. In the Bayesian approach to model selection or hypothesis testing, the main tool is the Bayes factor. When improper priors for the parameters appearing in the models are used, the Bayes factor is not well defined. The intrinsic Bayes factor introduced by Berger and Pericchi is an interesting method for overcoming that difficulty. That method is of particular interest as a means for generating proper prior distributions (intrinsic priors) for model comparison from the improper priors typically used in estimation. The goal of this article is to develop a limiting procedure that provides a solid justification for the use of Bayes factor with intrinsic priors. The procedure is formalized and discussed for nested and nonnested models. Illustrations and comparisons with other approximations to Bayes factors, such as the Bayesian information criterion of Schwarz and the fractional Bayes factor of O'Hagan are provided.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 134 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Improper priors typically arise in default Bayesian estimation problems. In the Bayesian approach to model selection or hypothesis testing, the main tool is the Bayes factor. When improper priors for the parameters appearing in the models are used, the Bayes factor is not well defined. The intrinsic Bayes factor introduced by Berger and Pericchi is an interesting method for overcoming that difficulty. That method is of particular interest as a means for generating proper prior distributions (intrinsic priors) for model comparison from the improper priors typically used in estimation. The goal of this article is to develop a limiting procedure that provides a solid justification for the use of Bayes factor with intrinsic priors. The procedure is formalized and discussed for nested and nonnested models. Illustrations and comparisons with other approximations to Bayes factors, such as the Bayesian information criterion of Schwarz and the fractional Bayes factor of O'Hagan are provided.

Key concepts: Bayes factor, Prior probability, Bayes' theorem, Model selection, Bayesian probability, Bayesian programming, Mathematics, Bayesian inference

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An Intrinsic Limiting Procedure for Model Selection and Hypotheses Testing — Research Paper | ScholarLens