1981Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresOpen access

On the structures and mapping of auroral electrostatic potentials

Y. T. Chiu, Alice L. Newman, John M. Cornwall

Open full text 106 citations

Abstract

We examine the mapping of magnetospheric and ionospheric electric fields in a kinetic model of magnetospheric‐ionospheric electrodynamic coupling proposed for the aurora by Chiu and Cornwall (1980). A new feature is the generalization of the kinetic current potential relationship to the return current region (identified as a region where the parallel potential drop from magnetosphere to ionosphere is positive); such a return current always exists unless the ionosphere is electrically charged to grossly unphysical values. We are able for the first time to give a coherent phenomenological picture of both the low‐energy return current and the high‐energy precipitation of an inverted V. The mapping between magnetospheric and ionospheric electric fields is phrased in terms of a Green’s function that acts as a filter, emphasizing magnetospheric latitudinal spatial scales of order (when mapped to the ionosphere) 50–150 km. We identify this length as roughly the overall size of the inverted V region. Roughly speaking, this scale length, when multiplied by the perpendicular electric field just above the ionosphere, gives the magnitude of the parallel potential drop between the ionosphere and equatorial magnetosphere. A precise relation between these quantities is given—for the first time—in the body of the paper; previous two‐dimensional kinetic models have taken the parallel potential drop as an assumed input.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We examine the mapping of magnetospheric and ionospheric electric fields in a kinetic model of magnetospheric‐ionospheric electrodynamic coupling proposed for the aurora by Chiu and Cornwall (1980). A new feature is the generalization of the kinetic current potential relationship to the return current region (identified as a region where the parallel potential drop from magnetosphere to ionosphere is positive); such a return current always exists unless the ionosphere is electrically charged to grossly unphysical values. We are able for the first time to give a coherent phenomenological picture of both the low‐energy return current and the high‐energy precipitation of an inverted V. The mapping between magnetospheric and ionospheric electric fields is phrased in terms of a Green’s function that acts as a filter, emphasizing magnetospheric latitudinal spatial scales of order (when mapped to the ionosphere) 50–150 km. We identify this length as roughly the overall size of the inverted V region. Roughly speaking, this scale length, when multiplied by the perpendicular electric field just above the ionosphere, gives the magnitude of the parallel potential drop between the ionosphere and equatorial magnetosphere. A precise relation between these quantities is given—for the first time—in the body of the paper; previous two‐dimensional kinetic models have taken the parallel potential drop as an assumed input.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 106 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We examine the mapping of magnetospheric and ionospheric electric fields in a kinetic model of magnetospheric‐ionospheric electrodynamic coupling proposed for the aurora by Chiu and Cornwall (1980). A new feature is the generalization of the kinetic current potential relationship to the return current region (identified as a region where the parallel potential drop from magnetosphere to ionosphere is positive); such a return current always exists unless the ionosphere is electrically charged to grossly unphysical values. We are able for the first time to give a coherent phenomenological picture of both the low‐energy return current and the high‐energy precipitation of an inverted V. The mapping between magnetospheric and ionospheric electric fields is phrased in terms of a Green’s function that acts as a filter, emphasizing magnetospheric latitudinal spatial scales of order (when mapped to the ionosphere) 50–150 km. We identify this length as roughly the overall size of the inverted V region. Roughly speaking, this scale length, when multiplied by the perpendicular electric field just above the ionosphere, gives the magnitude of the parallel potential drop between the ionosphere and equatorial magnetosphere. A precise relation between these quantities is given—for the first time—in the body of the paper; previous two‐dimensional kinetic models have taken the parallel potential drop as an assumed input.

Key concepts: Ionosphere, Physics, Magnetosphere, Electric field, Computational physics, Geophysics, Electron precipitation, Kinetic energy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the structures and mapping of auroral electrostatic potentials — Research Paper | ScholarLens