1983•Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresRequires access

Subdivision of the Mg‐suite noritic rocks into Mg‐gabbronorites and Mg‐norites

Odette B. James, M. K. Flohr

Open publisher page 69 citations

Abstract

Mg‐suite noritic rocks can be divided into two groups, the Mg‐gabbronorites and the Mg‐norites. The rocks of these groups differ in ratios of high‐Ca pyroxene to total pyroxene, compositions of pyroxene and plagioclase, assemblages of Ti‐, Nb‐, and Zr‐bearing minerals, compositions of chrome spinel, bulk‐rock Ti/Sm and Sc/Sm, and measured ages. The two groups probably crystallized from different types of parent magmas. Two hypotheses are offered for the differences in composition of the parent magmas. One hypothesis ascribes the differences to compositional heterogeneity of the mantle source areas. The other hypothesis ascribes the differences to variations in extent of partial melting of the mantle source regions and variations in extent of assimilation of the anorthosite and the highly differentiated residual liquid that were produced during the primordial lunar differentiation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Mg‐suite noritic rocks can be divided into two groups, the Mg‐gabbronorites and the Mg‐norites. The rocks of these groups differ in ratios of high‐Ca pyroxene to total pyroxene, compositions of pyroxene and plagioclase, assemblages of Ti‐, Nb‐, and Zr‐bearing minerals, compositions of chrome spinel, bulk‐rock Ti/Sm and Sc/Sm, and measured ages. The two groups probably crystallized from different types of parent magmas. Two hypotheses are offered for the differences in composition of the parent magmas. One hypothesis ascribes the differences to compositional heterogeneity of the mantle source areas. The other hypothesis ascribes the differences to variations in extent of partial melting of the mantle source regions and variations in extent of assimilation of the anorthosite and the highly differentiated residual liquid that were produced during the primordial lunar differentiation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 69 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Mg‐suite noritic rocks can be divided into two groups, the Mg‐gabbronorites and the Mg‐norites. The rocks of these groups differ in ratios of high‐Ca pyroxene to total pyroxene, compositions of pyroxene and plagioclase, assemblages of Ti‐, Nb‐, and Zr‐bearing minerals, compositions of chrome spinel, bulk‐rock Ti/Sm and Sc/Sm, and measured ages. The two groups probably crystallized from different types of parent magmas. Two hypotheses are offered for the differences in composition of the parent magmas. One hypothesis ascribes the differences to compositional heterogeneity of the mantle source areas. The other hypothesis ascribes the differences to variations in extent of partial melting of the mantle source regions and variations in extent of assimilation of the anorthosite and the highly differentiated residual liquid that were produced during the primordial lunar differentiation.

Key concepts: Anorthosite, Pyroxene, Plagioclase, Geology, Geochemistry, Mafic, Olivine, Mantle (geology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Subdivision of the Mg‐suite noritic rocks into Mg‐gabbronorites and Mg‐norites — Research Paper | ScholarLens