2013Academy of Management ProceedingsRequires access

Examining the Role of Observer Personality on the Predictive Validity of Personality Ratings

Ryan Klinger

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Drawing on Hogan’s Socioanalytic Theory (Hogan, 1996) and Funder’s Realistic Accuracy Model (Funder, 1995), I investigate key sources of variance in the predictive validity of reputational personality ratings. More specifically, I explore how characteristics of the individuals providing observer ratings of personality impact the relative and incremental predictive validities of these reputational ratings. Results of a field study indicate that in terms of predicting job performance, reputational ratings of personality have the potential to capture both higher relative predictive validities and higher incremental predictive validities over identity (i.e., self) ratings. However, the extent to which reputational ratings outperform identity ratings depends on personality characteristics of the observer such that relative and incremental predictive validities are highest when observers score high on measures of conscientious and openness.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Drawing on Hogan’s Socioanalytic Theory (Hogan, 1996) and Funder’s Realistic Accuracy Model (Funder, 1995), I investigate key sources of variance in the predictive validity of reputational personality ratings. More specifically, I explore how characteristics of the individuals providing observer ratings of personality impact the relative and incremental predictive validities of these reputational ratings. Results of a field study indicate that in terms of predicting job performance, reputational ratings of personality have the potential to capture both higher relative predictive validities and higher incremental predictive validities over identity (i.e., self) ratings. However, the extent to which reputational ratings outperform identity ratings depends on personality characteristics of the observer such that relative and incremental predictive validities are highest when observers score high on measures of conscientious and openness.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Drawing on Hogan’s Socioanalytic Theory (Hogan, 1996) and Funder’s Realistic Accuracy Model (Funder, 1995), I investigate key sources of variance in the predictive validity of reputational personality ratings. More specifically, I explore how characteristics of the individuals providing observer ratings of personality impact the relative and incremental predictive validities of these reputational ratings. Results of a field study indicate that in terms of predicting job performance, reputational ratings of personality have the potential to capture both higher relative predictive validities and higher incremental predictive validities over identity (i.e., self) ratings. However, the extent to which reputational ratings outperform identity ratings depends on personality characteristics of the observer such that relative and incremental predictive validities are highest when observers score high on measures of conscientious and openness.

Key concepts: Incremental validity, Psychology, Predictive validity, Personality, Hogan, Personality Assessment Inventory, Openness to experience, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Examining the Role of Observer Personality on the Predictive Validity of Personality Ratings — Research Paper | ScholarLens