1961•Physical ReviewRequires access

Differential Paramagnetic Effect in Superconductors

Robert A. Hein, R. L. Falge

Open publisher page 89 citations

Abstract

The magnetic moment and the differential magnetic susceptibility of two spherical samples of tin and tantalum have been measured as a function of magnetic field and temperature. The differential paramagnetic effect (DPE) is observed in both ac and dc mutual inductance measurements provided the sample exhibits a good Meissner effect. For a superconducting sample in which the infinite conductivity behavior dominates the Meissner effect, the DPE does not appear in the ac measurements but does, under certain conditions, show up in dc measurements. The results of the dc mutual inductance measurements are used to classify the DPE as reproducible or nonreproducible. The former is characteristic of ideal Meissner-type superconductors while the latter is more characteristic of superconductors whose macroscopic magnetic properties are dominated by the classical infinite electrical conductivity behavior. The superconducting-to-normal transitions obtained by the three techniques are compared and the data discussed in view of (a) occurrence of the DPE; (b) magnitude of the DPE; (c) ability of these data to give information about the volume participation of the sample; and (d) relation of the "characteristic magnetic fields" determined by these transitions and the bulk critical field of the sample.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The magnetic moment and the differential magnetic susceptibility of two spherical samples of tin and tantalum have been measured as a function of magnetic field and temperature. The differential paramagnetic effect (DPE) is observed in both ac and dc mutual inductance measurements provided the sample exhibits a good Meissner effect. For a superconducting sample in which the infinite conductivity behavior dominates the Meissner effect, the DPE does not appear in the ac measurements but does, under certain conditions, show up in dc measurements. The results of the dc mutual inductance measurements are used to classify the DPE as reproducible or nonreproducible. The former is characteristic of ideal Meissner-type superconductors while the latter is more characteristic of superconductors whose macroscopic magnetic properties are dominated by the classical infinite electrical conductivity behavior. The superconducting-to-normal transitions obtained by the three techniques are compared and the data discussed in view of (a) occurrence of the DPE; (b) magnitude of the DPE; (c) ability of these data to give information about the volume participation of the sample; and (d) relation of the "characteristic magnetic fields" determined by these transitions and the bulk critical field of the sample.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 89 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The magnetic moment and the differential magnetic susceptibility of two spherical samples of tin and tantalum have been measured as a function of magnetic field and temperature. The differential paramagnetic effect (DPE) is observed in both ac and dc mutual inductance measurements provided the sample exhibits a good Meissner effect. For a superconducting sample in which the infinite conductivity behavior dominates the Meissner effect, the DPE does not appear in the ac measurements but does, under certain conditions, show up in dc measurements. The results of the dc mutual inductance measurements are used to classify the DPE as reproducible or nonreproducible. The former is characteristic of ideal Meissner-type superconductors while the latter is more characteristic of superconductors whose macroscopic magnetic properties are dominated by the classical infinite electrical conductivity behavior. The superconducting-to-normal transitions obtained by the three techniques are compared and the data discussed in view of (a) occurrence of the DPE; (b) magnitude of the DPE; (c) ability of these data to give information about the volume participation of the sample; and (d) relation of the "characteristic magnetic fields" determined by these transitions and the bulk critical field of the sample.

Key concepts: Meissner effect, Condensed matter physics, Paramagnetism, Superconductivity, Superdiamagnetism, Electrical resistivity and conductivity, Magnetic field, Magnetic susceptibility

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Differential Paramagnetic Effect in Superconductors — Research Paper | ScholarLens