2002Review of Development EconomicsRequires access

Incentives, Risk, and Agency Costs in the Choice of Contractual Arrangements in Agriculture

Pradeep Agrawal

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

The author develops a theory of the choice of contractual arrangements in agriculture by analyzing the incentives, risk‐premia, and agency (supervision and shirking) costs under different contracts using the principal–agent framework. The theory is able to explain many tenancy‐related issues, such as why sharecropping can be the optimal contract even in the presence of considerable shirking by the tiller, the predominance of sharecropping and of the 50*T*:*T*50 output share, the coexistence of sharecropping with other contracts, and the tenancy ladder.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The author develops a theory of the choice of contractual arrangements in agriculture by analyzing the incentives, risk‐premia, and agency (supervision and shirking) costs under different contracts using the principal–agent framework. The theory is able to explain many tenancy‐related issues, such as why sharecropping can be the optimal contract even in the presence of considerable shirking by the tiller, the predominance of sharecropping and of the 50*T*:*T*50 output share, the coexistence of sharecropping with other contracts, and the tenancy ladder.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The author develops a theory of the choice of contractual arrangements in agriculture by analyzing the incentives, risk‐premia, and agency (supervision and shirking) costs under different contracts using the principal–agent framework. The theory is able to explain many tenancy‐related issues, such as why sharecropping can be the optimal contract even in the presence of considerable shirking by the tiller, the predominance of sharecropping and of the 50*T*:*T*50 output share, the coexistence of sharecropping with other contracts, and the tenancy ladder.

Key concepts: Sharecropping, Leasehold estate, Incentive, Economics, Agency (philosophy), Principal–agent problem, Agency cost, Microeconomics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Incentives, Risk, and Agency Costs in the Choice of Contractual Arrangements in Agriculture — Research Paper | ScholarLens