2013•Perspectives on Political ScienceRequires access

Progressive or Postmodern? The Use and Disadvantage of “Founders versus Progressives”

Joseph Postell

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In the last few decades a narrative of American political thought has emerged which attributes the transformation of the American regime over the last century to the Progressive movement. This narrative tells the story of the Founders versus the Progressives, and explains modern liberalism as a departure from the ideas of the Founders. This article argues that, on the whole, the Founders versus Progressives account is descriptively accurate. Nevertheless, there are important difficulties that the account has yet to explain adequately. The article proceeds to identify and explain one of these difficulties, namely the difference between old Progressivism and postmodern Progressivism. For the Founders versus Progressives account to offer a fully compelling explanation of developments in American political thought, it will have to explain how contemporary liberalism and postmodern Progressivism are related to the philosophy of the earlier Progressives.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the last few decades a narrative of American political thought has emerged which attributes the transformation of the American regime over the last century to the Progressive movement. This narrative tells the story of the Founders versus the Progressives, and explains modern liberalism as a departure from the ideas of the Founders. This article argues that, on the whole, the Founders versus Progressives account is descriptively accurate. Nevertheless, there are important difficulties that the account has yet to explain adequately. The article proceeds to identify and explain one of these difficulties, namely the difference between old Progressivism and postmodern Progressivism. For the Founders versus Progressives account to offer a fully compelling explanation of developments in American political thought, it will have to explain how contemporary liberalism and postmodern Progressivism are related to the philosophy of the earlier Progressives.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the last few decades a narrative of American political thought has emerged which attributes the transformation of the American regime over the last century to the Progressive movement. This narrative tells the story of the Founders versus the Progressives, and explains modern liberalism as a departure from the ideas of the Founders. This article argues that, on the whole, the Founders versus Progressives account is descriptively accurate. Nevertheless, there are important difficulties that the account has yet to explain adequately. The article proceeds to identify and explain one of these difficulties, namely the difference between old Progressivism and postmodern Progressivism. For the Founders versus Progressives account to offer a fully compelling explanation of developments in American political thought, it will have to explain how contemporary liberalism and postmodern Progressivism are related to the philosophy of the earlier Progressives.

Key concepts: Progressivism, Postmodernism, Liberalism, Narrative, Politics, Progressive education, Sociology, Disadvantage

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Progressive or Postmodern? The Use and Disadvantage of “Founders versus Progressives” — Research Paper | ScholarLens