2001•Journal of American HistoryRequires access

U.S. Labor and Political Action, 1918-24: A Comparison of Independent Political Action in New York, Chicago, and Seattle

Ruth A. O’Brien, Andrew Strouthous

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Andrew Strouthous's book U.S. Labor and Political Action starts where so many books about the American labor movement do—questioning Werner Sombart's thesis about the absence of a labor party. Distinguishing his study from the old school of labor history, Strouthous explores the “missing workers party” without relying on the theoretical framework provided by American exceptionalism. To him, the failure to build a labor party involved the balance of class forces more than any ideological commitment to liberalism in the United States. Strouthous studies the balance of working class forces in New York, Chicago, and Seattle after World War I. In his comparative analysis, he takes into account both the industrial structure of each city and whether progressives or radicals dominated state labor federations. The author convincingly shows that Samuel Gompers, the longtime head of the American Federation of Labor (AFL), battled against the labor parties in those cities without any guarantee of victory. It was only in 1924, when the AFL ended its policy of nonpartisanship and backed Robert La Follette, the candidate for the Conference for Progressive Political Action, that Gompers's opposition to a working class party finally prevailed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Andrew Strouthous's book U.S. Labor and Political Action starts where so many books about the American labor movement do—questioning Werner Sombart's thesis about the absence of a labor party. Distinguishing his study from the old school of labor history, Strouthous explores the “missing workers party” without relying on the theoretical framework provided by American exceptionalism. To him, the failure to build a labor party involved the balance of class forces more than any ideological commitment to liberalism in the United States. Strouthous studies the balance of working class forces in New York, Chicago, and Seattle after World War I. In his comparative analysis, he takes into account both the industrial structure of each city and whether progressives or radicals dominated state labor federations. The author convincingly shows that Samuel Gompers, the longtime head of the American Federation of Labor (AFL), battled against the labor parties in those cities without any guarantee of victory. It was only in 1924, when the AFL ended its policy of nonpartisanship and backed Robert La Follette, the candidate for the Conference for Progressive Political Action, that Gompers's opposition to a working class party finally prevailed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Andrew Strouthous's book U.S. Labor and Political Action starts where so many books about the American labor movement do—questioning Werner Sombart's thesis about the absence of a labor party. Distinguishing his study from the old school of labor history, Strouthous explores the “missing workers party” without relying on the theoretical framework provided by American exceptionalism. To him, the failure to build a labor party involved the balance of class forces more than any ideological commitment to liberalism in the United States. Strouthous studies the balance of working class forces in New York, Chicago, and Seattle after World War I. In his comparative analysis, he takes into account both the industrial structure of each city and whether progressives or radicals dominated state labor federations. The author convincingly shows that Samuel Gompers, the longtime head of the American Federation of Labor (AFL), battled against the labor parties in those cities without any guarantee of victory. It was only in 1924, when the AFL ended its policy of nonpartisanship and backed Robert La Follette, the candidate for the Conference for Progressive Political Action, that Gompers's opposition to a working class party finally prevailed.

Key concepts: Politics, Political action, Action (physics), History, Sociology, Media studies, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
U.S. Labor and Political Action, 1918-24: A Comparison of Independent Political Action in New York, Chicago, and Seattle — Research Paper | ScholarLens