2009California Journal of Politics and PolicyOpen access

Should Proposition 8 Be Held to be Retroactive?

Jesse H. Choper

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

The legal challenges to Proposition 8 all involve matters of state law on which the California Supreme Court alone is the final authority.But even if the court agrees with interveners and upholds the validity of Proposition 8, there is a separate question of its effect on the 18,000 couples who have already been married.On this issue, the California Supreme Court must first determine if the voters intended the proposition to apply retroactively.This essay urges that it should not be construed as being retroactive and, in doing so, explores two possible challenges under the U.S. Constitution if the court were to interpret Proposition 8 so as to invalidate the 18,000 marriages.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The legal challenges to Proposition 8 all involve matters of state law on which the California Supreme Court alone is the final authority.But even if the court agrees with interveners and upholds the validity of Proposition 8, there is a separate question of its effect on the 18,000 couples who have already been married.On this issue, the California Supreme Court must first determine if the voters intended the proposition to apply retroactively.This essay urges that it should not be construed as being retroactive and, in doing so, explores two possible challenges under the U.S. Constitution if the court were to interpret Proposition 8 so as to invalidate the 18,000 marriages.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The legal challenges to Proposition 8 all involve matters of state law on which the California Supreme Court alone is the final authority.But even if the court agrees with interveners and upholds the validity of Proposition 8, there is a separate question of its effect on the 18,000 couples who have already been married.On this issue, the California Supreme Court must first determine if the voters intended the proposition to apply retroactively.This essay urges that it should not be construed as being retroactive and, in doing so, explores two possible challenges under the U.S. Constitution if the court were to interpret Proposition 8 so as to invalidate the 18,000 marriages.

Key concepts: Proposition, California Proposition 13, Supreme court, Constitution, Law, Political science, Supreme Court Decisions, State (computer science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Should Proposition 8 Be Held to be Retroactive? — Research Paper | ScholarLens