2009International Journal of Environment and Sustainable DevelopmentRequires access

A new approach to distributing urban trips

William R. Black

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The traditional approach to urban transportation planning involves trip generation, distribution, modal split and assignment. For the most part these steps are logical and have a reasonable foundation in reality. The weakest of these on logical grounds is the distribution of trips using the gravity model. This approach gained acceptance in large part because total trips in an urban area tend to decrease with increasing distance. It is argued here that this is an artefact of the geographical distribution of trip productions and attractions. If this is true it has significant implications for sustainable transport, lands use planning and congestion management, i.e., we may be controlling the wrong variables. A new approach to trip distribution is proposed that assigns trips on the basis of opportunity sets (possible destinations) and trip purpose ranges (the maximum distance one is willing to or must travel for a given purpose).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The traditional approach to urban transportation planning involves trip generation, distribution, modal split and assignment. For the most part these steps are logical and have a reasonable foundation in reality. The weakest of these on logical grounds is the distribution of trips using the gravity model. This approach gained acceptance in large part because total trips in an urban area tend to decrease with increasing distance. It is argued here that this is an artefact of the geographical distribution of trip productions and attractions. If this is true it has significant implications for sustainable transport, lands use planning and congestion management, i.e., we may be controlling the wrong variables. A new approach to trip distribution is proposed that assigns trips on the basis of opportunity sets (possible destinations) and trip purpose ranges (the maximum distance one is willing to or must travel for a given purpose).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The traditional approach to urban transportation planning involves trip generation, distribution, modal split and assignment. For the most part these steps are logical and have a reasonable foundation in reality. The weakest of these on logical grounds is the distribution of trips using the gravity model. This approach gained acceptance in large part because total trips in an urban area tend to decrease with increasing distance. It is argued here that this is an artefact of the geographical distribution of trip productions and attractions. If this is true it has significant implications for sustainable transport, lands use planning and congestion management, i.e., we may be controlling the wrong variables. A new approach to trip distribution is proposed that assigns trips on the basis of opportunity sets (possible destinations) and trip purpose ranges (the maximum distance one is willing to or must travel for a given purpose).

Key concepts: TRIPS architecture, Trip distribution, Trip generation, Modal, Destinations, Distribution (mathematics), Transport engineering, Transportation planning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A new approach to distributing urban trips — Research Paper | ScholarLens