1982The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical CareRequires access

Indications for Aortography in Blunt Thoracic Trauma

Steven R. Gundry, Stephen A. Williams, Richard E. Burney, Kyung J. Cho, James R. Mackenzie

Open publisher page 56 citations

Abstract

The indications for aortography in patients sustaining blunt chest trauma have increased as the number of radiographic and clinical findings associated with traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta (TRA) proliferate. No studies, however, have demonstrated whether these findings are useful in selecting patients for aortography. In order to determine the predictive value of reported associations in TRA, the presence or absence of nine radiographic and nine clinical findings associated with TRA were tabulated and tested for correlation with the results of aortography in 173 consecutive patients who underwent arch aortography from 1975 to 1980 to rule out TRA following blunt trauma. Mediastinal widening was the most reliable indicator of TRA. All patients less than 65 years old with TRA presented with mediastinal widening. In patients under 65, the reliability of mediastinal widening to predict TRA was not enhanced by any other clinical or radiographic finding studied. On the other hand, only two of six TRA's in patients over 65 had mediastinal widening. Only in this group over 65 did other publicized indications for aortography, including pulmonary contusions or multiple rib fractures including ribs 1 and 2, have any association singly or in combination with TRA. We conclude that all trauma victims who have a widened mediastinum should undergo aortography. Other reported associations by themselves are not absolute indications for aortography except in patients 65 years old or older.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The indications for aortography in patients sustaining blunt chest trauma have increased as the number of radiographic and clinical findings associated with traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta (TRA) proliferate. No studies, however, have demonstrated whether these findings are useful in selecting patients for aortography. In order to determine the predictive value of reported associations in TRA, the presence or absence of nine radiographic and nine clinical findings associated with TRA were tabulated and tested for correlation with the results of aortography in 173 consecutive patients who underwent arch aortography from 1975 to 1980 to rule out TRA following blunt trauma. Mediastinal widening was the most reliable indicator of TRA. All patients less than 65 years old with TRA presented with mediastinal widening. In patients under 65, the reliability of mediastinal widening to predict TRA was not enhanced by any other clinical or radiographic finding studied. On the other hand, only two of six TRA's in patients over 65 had mediastinal widening. Only in this group over 65 did other publicized indications for aortography, including pulmonary contusions or multiple rib fractures including ribs 1 and 2, have any association singly or in combination with TRA. We conclude that all trauma victims who have a widened mediastinum should undergo aortography. Other reported associations by themselves are not absolute indications for aortography except in patients 65 years old or older.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 56 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The indications for aortography in patients sustaining blunt chest trauma have increased as the number of radiographic and clinical findings associated with traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta (TRA) proliferate. No studies, however, have demonstrated whether these findings are useful in selecting patients for aortography. In order to determine the predictive value of reported associations in TRA, the presence or absence of nine radiographic and nine clinical findings associated with TRA were tabulated and tested for correlation with the results of aortography in 173 consecutive patients who underwent arch aortography from 1975 to 1980 to rule out TRA following blunt trauma. Mediastinal widening was the most reliable indicator of TRA. All patients less than 65 years old with TRA presented with mediastinal widening. In patients under 65, the reliability of mediastinal widening to predict TRA was not enhanced by any other clinical or radiographic finding studied. On the other hand, only two of six TRA's in patients over 65 had mediastinal widening. Only in this group over 65 did other publicized indications for aortography, including pulmonary contusions or multiple rib fractures including ribs 1 and 2, have any association singly or in combination with TRA. We conclude that all trauma victims who have a widened mediastinum should undergo aortography. Other reported associations by themselves are not absolute indications for aortography except in patients 65 years old or older.

Key concepts: Aortography, Medicine, Blunt, Radiology, Blunt trauma, Thoracic aorta, Mediastinum, Aortic arch

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Indications for Aortography in Blunt Thoracic Trauma — Research Paper | ScholarLens