2010•School for International Training Digital Collections (School for International Training)Requires access

Stormwater Policy: Case Study Of Advocacy For Updated Stormwater Management Practices In Montgomery County, Maryland

Emily Zachery

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The case study describes and examines The Potomac Conservancy’s advocacy for low impact stormwater management principles in the Montgomery County, Maryland “Road Code.” Low impact practices such as stormwater retention and Vegetated Integrated Management Practices (V-IMPs) can reduce the impact of stormwater runoff, which often carries pollution and sediment. Increased urbanization enhances this threat, contributing to impaired waters in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. The Conservancy teamed with the Audubon Naturalist Society through the Stormwater Partners Network to ask local government to integrate low impact development (LID), or environmental site design (ESD), in a revised county road code. The method of inquiry included review of primary documents, an interview with a Conservancy staff member, and an interview with an individual directly involved with the policy advocacy effort. Secondary literature provided the lenses through which to evaluate the effort. Through the evaluation it is determined that the resulting policy is too narrow, ruling out remedial work, seeking only to mitigate impact in new projects, and failing to address the design, building, and infrastructure practices that cause the issue. The new policy is, however, the direct result of a successful campaign. Through building an effective, local coalition, the Stormwater Partners Network positions itself as a strong advocate with the necessary understanding of local issues. These strengths are built on by developing a thorough understanding of the technical components of the issue and, even more importantly, of the targeted decision-makers. The coalition fails, however, to develop an understanding of the historical context of the technical components of the issue and fails to incorporate public outreach in its effort. Though the coalition effectively relies on its members as it completes the advocacy effort, additional resources could have been pooled from the community at large.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The case study describes and examines The Potomac Conservancy’s advocacy for low impact stormwater management principles in the Montgomery County, Maryland “Road Code.” Low impact practices such as stormwater retention and Vegetated Integrated Management Practices (V-IMPs) can reduce the impact of stormwater runoff, which often carries pollution and sediment. Increased urbanization enhances this threat, contributing to impaired waters in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. The Conservancy teamed with the Audubon Naturalist Society through the Stormwater Partners Network to ask local government to integrate low impact development (LID), or environmental site design (ESD), in a revised county road code. The method of inquiry included review of primary documents, an interview with a Conservancy staff member, and an interview with an individual directly involved with the policy advocacy effort. Secondary literature provided the lenses through which to evaluate the effort. Through the evaluation it is determined that the resulting policy is too narrow, ruling out remedial work, seeking only to mitigate impact in new projects, and failing to address the design, building, and infrastructure practices that cause the issue. The new policy is, however, the direct result of a successful campaign. Through building an effective, local coalition, the Stormwater Partners Network positions itself as a strong advocate with the necessary understanding of local issues. These strengths are built on by developing a thorough understanding of the technical components of the issue and, even more importantly, of the targeted decision-makers. The coalition fails, however, to develop an understanding of the historical context of the technical components of the issue and fails to incorporate public outreach in its effort. Though the coalition effectively relies on its members as it completes the advocacy effort, additional resources could have been pooled from the community at large.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The case study describes and examines The Potomac Conservancy’s advocacy for low impact stormwater management principles in the Montgomery County, Maryland “Road Code.” Low impact practices such as stormwater retention and Vegetated Integrated Management Practices (V-IMPs) can reduce the impact of stormwater runoff, which often carries pollution and sediment. Increased urbanization enhances this threat, contributing to impaired waters in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. The Conservancy teamed with the Audubon Naturalist Society through the Stormwater Partners Network to ask local government to integrate low impact development (LID), or environmental site design (ESD), in a revised county road code. The method of inquiry included review of primary documents, an interview with a Conservancy staff member, and an interview with an individual directly involved with the policy advocacy effort. Secondary literature provided the lenses through which to evaluate the effort. Through the evaluation it is determined that the resulting policy is too narrow, ruling out remedial work, seeking only to mitigate impact in new projects, and failing to address the design, building, and infrastructure practices that cause the issue. The new policy is, however, the direct result of a successful campaign. Through building an effective, local coalition, the Stormwater Partners Network positions itself as a strong advocate with the necessary understanding of local issues. These strengths are built on by developing a thorough understanding of the technical components of the issue and, even more importantly, of the targeted decision-makers. The coalition fails, however, to develop an understanding of the historical context of the technical components of the issue and fails to incorporate public outreach in its effort. Though the coalition effectively relies on its members as it completes the advocacy effort, additional resources could have been pooled from the community at large.

Key concepts: Stormwater management, Stormwater, Environmental planning, Business, Environmental resource management, Public administration, Political science, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Stormwater Policy: Case Study Of Advocacy For Updated Stormwater Management Practices In Montgomery County, Maryland — Research Paper | ScholarLens