1998Journal of Legislative StudiesRequires access

Proportional representation and a ‘fair electoral system’ for the United Kingdom

Ron Johnston

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Most proponents of electoral reform in the UK argue that the current system is unfair to parties, because the outcome is invariably far from their norm of proportional representation. There is an assumption (almost always implicit and unconsidered) in their arguments that achievement of proportional representation would remove that unfairness, and that power would be allocated to the parties in the House of Commons commensurate with their proportion of the seats there. This paper evaluates that case and finds it wanting: proportional representation will almost certainly not bring with it proportional power ‐ though it may result in parties that are powerless under the present system having some power.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Most proponents of electoral reform in the UK argue that the current system is unfair to parties, because the outcome is invariably far from their norm of proportional representation. There is an assumption (almost always implicit and unconsidered) in their arguments that achievement of proportional representation would remove that unfairness, and that power would be allocated to the parties in the House of Commons commensurate with their proportion of the seats there. This paper evaluates that case and finds it wanting: proportional representation will almost certainly not bring with it proportional power ‐ though it may result in parties that are powerless under the present system having some power.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Most proponents of electoral reform in the UK argue that the current system is unfair to parties, because the outcome is invariably far from their norm of proportional representation. There is an assumption (almost always implicit and unconsidered) in their arguments that achievement of proportional representation would remove that unfairness, and that power would be allocated to the parties in the House of Commons commensurate with their proportion of the seats there. This paper evaluates that case and finds it wanting: proportional representation will almost certainly not bring with it proportional power ‐ though it may result in parties that are powerless under the present system having some power.

Key concepts: Proportional representation, House of Commons, Electoral system, Representation (politics), Norm (philosophy), Power (physics), Outcome (game theory), Electoral reform

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Proportional representation and a ‘fair electoral system’ for the United Kingdom — Research Paper | ScholarLens