2008ScreenRequires access

Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated World

Kimberley Healey

Open publisher page 212 citations

Abstract

Why study fans? Fandom is ubiquitous, with everyone appearing either to be a fan or acquainted with someone who is. As this thought-provoking collection of original essays suggests, it is because of fandom's ubiquity that the study of its practices, performances and communities is of value. Fan studies is not (as it is sometimes comically suggested) restricted to the deviant practices of socially maladjusted outsiders, but the source of excellent work on the performance of identity and the construction of community in mainstream society. If everyone is a fan, then the study of fan culture has fascinating things to say about everyone. The essays are divided into six broad sections: aesthetic and legal judgments of fan-objects and fan texts; fandom ‘beyond pop culture’; imagined and physical spaces of fandom; fan audiences worldwide; an inspection of fan cultures; and a focus on the various discords located within fandom, presented in the person of the anti-fan. Like fans themselves, the essays are not always amenable to strict classification. Instead, the themes from one section may be reflected in an essay from another – possibly confusing for those who like everything in its place, but entirely appropriate to the book's ethos.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Why study fans? Fandom is ubiquitous, with everyone appearing either to be a fan or acquainted with someone who is. As this thought-provoking collection of original essays suggests, it is because of fandom's ubiquity that the study of its practices, performances and communities is of value. Fan studies is not (as it is sometimes comically suggested) restricted to the deviant practices of socially maladjusted outsiders, but the source of excellent work on the performance of identity and the construction of community in mainstream society. If everyone is a fan, then the study of fan culture has fascinating things to say about everyone. The essays are divided into six broad sections: aesthetic and legal judgments of fan-objects and fan texts; fandom ‘beyond pop culture’; imagined and physical spaces of fandom; fan audiences worldwide; an inspection of fan cultures; and a focus on the various discords located within fandom, presented in the person of the anti-fan. Like fans themselves, the essays are not always amenable to strict classification. Instead, the themes from one section may be reflected in an essay from another – possibly confusing for those who like everything in its place, but entirely appropriate to the book's ethos.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 212 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Why study fans? Fandom is ubiquitous, with everyone appearing either to be a fan or acquainted with someone who is. As this thought-provoking collection of original essays suggests, it is because of fandom's ubiquity that the study of its practices, performances and communities is of value. Fan studies is not (as it is sometimes comically suggested) restricted to the deviant practices of socially maladjusted outsiders, but the source of excellent work on the performance of identity and the construction of community in mainstream society. If everyone is a fan, then the study of fan culture has fascinating things to say about everyone. The essays are divided into six broad sections: aesthetic and legal judgments of fan-objects and fan texts; fandom ‘beyond pop culture’; imagined and physical spaces of fandom; fan audiences worldwide; an inspection of fan cultures; and a focus on the various discords located within fandom, presented in the person of the anti-fan. Like fans themselves, the essays are not always amenable to strict classification. Instead, the themes from one section may be reflected in an essay from another – possibly confusing for those who like everything in its place, but entirely appropriate to the book's ethos.

Key concepts: Fandom, Media studies, Sociology, Performance art, Art, Art history

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated World — Research Paper | ScholarLens