Use of Akaike information criterion for selection of flood frequency distribution
K. C. Ander Chow, W. E. Watt
Abstract
K. C. Ander Chow, W. E. Watt
Abstract
When conducting a conventional single-station flood frequency analysis, an appropriate distribution must be selected. Typically, sample statistics, probability plots, goodness-of-fit tests, etc. are used to facilitate the decision process. For the predominate case of a relatively short record length of flood series, this standard approach leads to undue emphasis on goodness of fit and virtually no consideration of the uncertainty due to additional parameters. The information criterion suggested by Akaike (AIC) is a measure to evaluate the "benefit" of goodness of fit and the "cost" of parameter uncertainty. The criterion is tested for 42 long-term hydrometric stations across Canada and its applicability and limitations are demonstrated in eight samples. The AIC is recommended as an aid in selecting a flood frequency distribution. Key words: flood frequency, goodness of fit, single station, information criterion.
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
When conducting a conventional single-station flood frequency analysis, an appropriate distribution must be selected. Typically, sample statistics, probability plots, goodness-of-fit tests, etc. are used to facilitate the decision process. For the predominate case of a relatively short record length of flood series, this standard approach leads to undue emphasis on goodness of fit and virtually no consideration of the uncertainty due to additional parameters. The information criterion suggested by Akaike (AIC) is a measure to evaluate the "benefit" of goodness of fit and the "cost" of parameter uncertainty. The criterion is tested for 42 long-term hydrometric stations across Canada and its applicability and limitations are demonstrated in eight samples. The AIC is recommended as an aid in selecting a flood frequency distribution. Key words: flood frequency, goodness of fit, single station, information criterion.
Key concepts: Akaike information criterion, Goodness of fit, Statistics, Bayesian information criterion, Flood myth, Mathematics, Model selection, Frequency distribution