2002Journal of Japan Society on Water EnvironmentOpen access

Fate of Haloacetic Acids in Wastewater Treatment Process and in Water Environment.

Shinsuke Namoto, Taro Urase, Kazuya NEHASHI

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Haloacetic acids (HAAs) in wastewater effluents from the wastewater treatment plants which are located along the Tama River system and in river waters of the river system were examined. The fate of HAAs in wastewater treatment processes was investigated. The mean concentrations of dichloroacetic acid (DCAA) and trichloroacetic acid (TCAA) in wastewater effluents were 0.81, 4.2 μg·l-1, respectively. In the case of river water samples, DCAA was detected in very low concentrations, while TCAA was almost always detected with the concentration range from 0.2 to 1 μg·l-1. The removal of HAAs in river water treatment facilities using the gravel bed contact-purification method was insignificant. Tap water would be one of the major sources of HAAs in wastewater influents, while the contributions of industrial wastewater were not negligible. The mean removal ratios of DCAA and TCAA by activated sludge process in aeration tank were 97% and 29%, respectively. These results can be explained by the difference in the degradability of different species of HAAs. The amount of TCAA produced by the chlorination carried out in wastewater treatment plants was insignificant compared with that remaining after the biological treatment at almost all plants examined, though a high formation of HAAs was observed in the case of an exceptional treatment plant.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Haloacetic acids (HAAs) in wastewater effluents from the wastewater treatment plants which are located along the Tama River system and in river waters of the river system were examined. The fate of HAAs in wastewater treatment processes was investigated. The mean concentrations of dichloroacetic acid (DCAA) and trichloroacetic acid (TCAA) in wastewater effluents were 0.81, 4.2 μg·l-1, respectively. In the case of river water samples, DCAA was detected in very low concentrations, while TCAA was almost always detected with the concentration range from 0.2 to 1 μg·l-1. The removal of HAAs in river water treatment facilities using the gravel bed contact-purification method was insignificant. Tap water would be one of the major sources of HAAs in wastewater influents, while the contributions of industrial wastewater were not negligible. The mean removal ratios of DCAA and TCAA by activated sludge process in aeration tank were 97% and 29%, respectively. These results can be explained by the difference in the degradability of different species of HAAs. The amount of TCAA produced by the chlorination carried out in wastewater treatment plants was insignificant compared with that remaining after the biological treatment at almost all plants examined, though a high formation of HAAs was observed in the case of an exceptional treatment plant.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Haloacetic acids (HAAs) in wastewater effluents from the wastewater treatment plants which are located along the Tama River system and in river waters of the river system were examined. The fate of HAAs in wastewater treatment processes was investigated. The mean concentrations of dichloroacetic acid (DCAA) and trichloroacetic acid (TCAA) in wastewater effluents were 0.81, 4.2 μg·l-1, respectively. In the case of river water samples, DCAA was detected in very low concentrations, while TCAA was almost always detected with the concentration range from 0.2 to 1 μg·l-1. The removal of HAAs in river water treatment facilities using the gravel bed contact-purification method was insignificant. Tap water would be one of the major sources of HAAs in wastewater influents, while the contributions of industrial wastewater were not negligible. The mean removal ratios of DCAA and TCAA by activated sludge process in aeration tank were 97% and 29%, respectively. These results can be explained by the difference in the degradability of different species of HAAs. The amount of TCAA produced by the chlorination carried out in wastewater treatment plants was insignificant compared with that remaining after the biological treatment at almost all plants examined, though a high formation of HAAs was observed in the case of an exceptional treatment plant.

Key concepts: Haloacetic acids, Wastewater, Dichloroacetic acid, Effluent, Sewage treatment, Environmental chemistry, Environmental science, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fate of Haloacetic Acids in Wastewater Treatment Process and in Water Environment. — Research Paper | ScholarLens