A comparison of lanreotide and octreotide LAR for treatment of acromegaly

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Two long-acting depot somatostatin analogues have recently been licensed for the treatment of acromegaly. We wished to assess the effectiveness of both these drugs in suppressing mean GH to a target of < 5 mU/l in patients with acromegaly unselected for responsiveness to octreotide, and also to compare the effects of both drugs METHODS: We prospectively studied 10 unselected patients with acromegaly who were treated first with lanreotide (LAN) and then octreotide LAR (LAR) following a washout period. The target for therapy was to achieve mean GH less than 5 mU/l. RESULTS: Five (50%) patients achieved mean GH < 5 mU/l on lanreotide 30 mg every 10 days, and 7 out of 9 (77.8%) achieved this level when the dose frequency was increased to every 7 days. On 20 mg octreotide LAR, 6 (60%) patients achieved the target mean GH and a further 2 (80%) when the dose was increased to 30 mg. Normalization of IGF-1 occurred in 5/9 (55.6%) patients who received lanreotide and 7/10 (70%) of those who received octreotide LAR. There was a significant difference in mean GH attained on the 2 drugs. The patients' mean GH was significantly lower when treated with octreotide LAR 20 mg every 4 weeks compared with lanreotide 30 mg every 10 days (P = 0.037). Maximal suppression of mean GH with 30 mg octreotide LAR or 7 day dosing of lanreotide was significantly greater on octreotide LAR (P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: At current dose recommendations, lanreotide and octreotide LAR are both effective in lowering mean GH to 'safe' (< 5 mU/l) levels in 80% patients but octreotide LAR treatment leads to significantly lower mean GH.