1996BMJOpen access

Sentencing mentally disordered offenders

Derek Chiswick

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

The British government has introduced a new law for dealing with mentally disordered offenders because, it says, “the public has a right to expect to be protected from dangerous offenders” (Home Office press release 130/96, “Stronger powers for courts in sentencing mentally disordered offenders,” 3 May 1996). For nearly 40 years magistrates and judges have had the option of sending such people to hospital instead of prison. Under section 37 of the Mental Health Act 1983, such “hospital orders” depend on clinical evidence that the offender suffers from a mental disorder (mental illness, mental impairment, severe mental impairment, or psychopathic disorder) for which compulsory treatment in hospital is appropriate, and on the court's view that it is the most suitable disposal. About 600 hospital orders are made by courts in England annually. Discharge from hospital is at the discretion of the treating consultant or mental health review tribunal. When there is a requirement to protect the public from serious harm, the sentencing judge can impose an order under section 41 restricting discharge indefinitely. These cases (about 250 a year) are handed over to the psychiatrist for treatment and to the home secretary …

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The British government has introduced a new law for dealing with mentally disordered offenders because, it says, “the public has a right to expect to be protected from dangerous offenders” (Home Office press release 130/96, “Stronger powers for courts in sentencing mentally disordered offenders,” 3 May 1996). For nearly 40 years magistrates and judges have had the option of sending such people to hospital instead of prison. Under section 37 of the Mental Health Act 1983, such “hospital orders” depend on clinical evidence that the offender suffers from a mental disorder (mental illness, mental impairment, severe mental impairment, or psychopathic disorder) for which compulsory treatment in hospital is appropriate, and on the court's view that it is the most suitable disposal. About 600 hospital orders are made by courts in England annually. Discharge from hospital is at the discretion of the treating consultant or mental health review tribunal. When there is a requirement to protect the public from serious harm, the sentencing judge can impose an order under section 41 restricting discharge indefinitely. These cases (about 250 a year) are handed over to the psychiatrist for treatment and to the home secretary …

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The British government has introduced a new law for dealing with mentally disordered offenders because, it says, “the public has a right to expect to be protected from dangerous offenders” (Home Office press release 130/96, “Stronger powers for courts in sentencing mentally disordered offenders,” 3 May 1996). For nearly 40 years magistrates and judges have had the option of sending such people to hospital instead of prison. Under section 37 of the Mental Health Act 1983, such “hospital orders” depend on clinical evidence that the offender suffers from a mental disorder (mental illness, mental impairment, severe mental impairment, or psychopathic disorder) for which compulsory treatment in hospital is appropriate, and on the court's view that it is the most suitable disposal. About 600 hospital orders are made by courts in England annually. Discharge from hospital is at the discretion of the treating consultant or mental health review tribunal. When there is a requirement to protect the public from serious harm, the sentencing judge can impose an order under section 41 restricting discharge indefinitely. These cases (about 250 a year) are handed over to the psychiatrist for treatment and to the home secretary …

Key concepts: Criminology, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sentencing mentally disordered offenders — Research Paper | ScholarLens