2011Journal of Analytical Atomic SpectrometryRequires access

Comparison of principal components regression, partial least squares regression, multi-block partial least squares regression, and serial partial least squares regression algorithms for the analysis of Fe in iron ore using LIBS

Pavel Yaroshchyk, David L. Death, Steven J. Spencer

Open publisher page 99 citations

Abstract

The objective of the current research was to compare different data-driven multivariate statistical predictive algorithms for the quantitative analysis of Fe content in iron ore measured using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS). The algorithms investigated were Principal Components Regression (PCR), Partial Least Squares Regression (PLS), Multi-Block Partial Least Squares (MB-PLS), and Serial Partial Least Squares Regression (S-PLS). Particular emphasis was placed on the issues of the selection and combination of atomic spectral data available from two separate spectrometers covering 208–222 nm and 300–855 nm ranges, which include many of the spectral features of interest. Standard PLS and PCR models produced similar prediction accuracy, although in the case of PLS there were notably less latent variables in use by the model. It was further shown that MB-PLS and S-PLS algorithms which both treated available UV and VIS data blocks separately, demonstrated inferior performance in comparison with both PCR and PLS.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objective of the current research was to compare different data-driven multivariate statistical predictive algorithms for the quantitative analysis of Fe content in iron ore measured using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS). The algorithms investigated were Principal Components Regression (PCR), Partial Least Squares Regression (PLS), Multi-Block Partial Least Squares (MB-PLS), and Serial Partial Least Squares Regression (S-PLS). Particular emphasis was placed on the issues of the selection and combination of atomic spectral data available from two separate spectrometers covering 208–222 nm and 300–855 nm ranges, which include many of the spectral features of interest. Standard PLS and PCR models produced similar prediction accuracy, although in the case of PLS there were notably less latent variables in use by the model. It was further shown that MB-PLS and S-PLS algorithms which both treated available UV and VIS data blocks separately, demonstrated inferior performance in comparison with both PCR and PLS.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 99 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objective of the current research was to compare different data-driven multivariate statistical predictive algorithms for the quantitative analysis of Fe content in iron ore measured using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS). The algorithms investigated were Principal Components Regression (PCR), Partial Least Squares Regression (PLS), Multi-Block Partial Least Squares (MB-PLS), and Serial Partial Least Squares Regression (S-PLS). Particular emphasis was placed on the issues of the selection and combination of atomic spectral data available from two separate spectrometers covering 208–222 nm and 300–855 nm ranges, which include many of the spectral features of interest. Standard PLS and PCR models produced similar prediction accuracy, although in the case of PLS there were notably less latent variables in use by the model. It was further shown that MB-PLS and S-PLS algorithms which both treated available UV and VIS data blocks separately, demonstrated inferior performance in comparison with both PCR and PLS.

Key concepts: Partial least squares regression, Principal component regression, Regression analysis, Principal component analysis, Statistics, Multivariate statistics, Linear regression, Regression

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of principal components regression, partial least squares regression, multi-block partial least squares regression, and serial partial least squares regression algorithms for the analysis of Fe in iron ore using LIBS — Research Paper | ScholarLens