1990International Review for the Sociology of SportRequires access

On Theory of Science for the Sociology of Sport: New Structuralism, Action, Intention and Practical Meaning

Günther Lüschen

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

In the tradition of an empirically oriented action theory and von Brentano the sociology of sport as playful competition should contribute to a unified sport science, to sociology proper and it should reflect on its methodology and theory of science. New structuralism (Stegmßüßller, Sneed) is being advocated for theory-building. The basic intentionality in sport is being pursued with von Wright for individual motivation, institutionalized norms, ability and situation. This 'logic of events' suggests only limited uses for causal and teleological argumentation and the figure of practical syllogism as well as intentionality imply a definite linkage to notions of application and practicality in sociology of sport. A number of empirical studies of sport are cited to corroborate the methodological argument for action theory, new structuralism and practical meaning.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the tradition of an empirically oriented action theory and von Brentano the sociology of sport as playful competition should contribute to a unified sport science, to sociology proper and it should reflect on its methodology and theory of science. New structuralism (Stegmßüßller, Sneed) is being advocated for theory-building. The basic intentionality in sport is being pursued with von Wright for individual motivation, institutionalized norms, ability and situation. This 'logic of events' suggests only limited uses for causal and teleological argumentation and the figure of practical syllogism as well as intentionality imply a definite linkage to notions of application and practicality in sociology of sport. A number of empirical studies of sport are cited to corroborate the methodological argument for action theory, new structuralism and practical meaning.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the tradition of an empirically oriented action theory and von Brentano the sociology of sport as playful competition should contribute to a unified sport science, to sociology proper and it should reflect on its methodology and theory of science. New structuralism (Stegmßüßller, Sneed) is being advocated for theory-building. The basic intentionality in sport is being pursued with von Wright for individual motivation, institutionalized norms, ability and situation. This 'logic of events' suggests only limited uses for causal and teleological argumentation and the figure of practical syllogism as well as intentionality imply a definite linkage to notions of application and practicality in sociology of sport. A number of empirical studies of sport are cited to corroborate the methodological argument for action theory, new structuralism and practical meaning.

Key concepts: Epistemology, Structuralism (philosophy of science), Sociology, Intentionality, Teleology, Meaning (existential), Argumentation theory, Action (physics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On Theory of Science for the Sociology of Sport: New Structuralism, Action, Intention and Practical Meaning — Research Paper | ScholarLens