1970•Poultry ScienceOpen access

Effect of Glutamic Acid and Antiacids on Chick Bioassay of Protein Quality of Fish Meals

D. Craig Miller, Robert R. Kifer

Open full text 10 citations

Abstract

IN A study of dietary factors affecting a 3-week chick bioassay of fish meal quality, Miller and Kifer (1970) indicated that the method responded to the quality as well as to the quantity of the dietary protein. Chicks fed an aged fish meal as the sole source of protein were very sensitive to a detrimental excessive addition (2.59%) of glycine and also to small additions of methionine and lysine. Nevertheless, the addition of 0.36% arginine to the aged fish meal gave a 9% increase in growth. Ousterhout and Snyder (1962), by adding 5% glutamic acid as a “stress” factor to a 15% protein diet, containing fish meal as a sole source protein, demonstrated that the sulfur amino acids (methionine and cystine) were the first limiting in those fish meals which gave very poor growth. Hegsted (1944), Klain et al. (1958), Fisher et al. (1960), Dean and Scott (1965), and many…

About this research paper

What this paper is about

IN A study of dietary factors affecting a 3-week chick bioassay of fish meal quality, Miller and Kifer (1970) indicated that the method responded to the quality as well as to the quantity of the dietary protein. Chicks fed an aged fish meal as the sole source of protein were very sensitive to a detrimental excessive addition (2.59%) of glycine and also to small additions of methionine and lysine. Nevertheless, the addition of 0.36% arginine to the aged fish meal gave a 9% increase in growth. Ousterhout and Snyder (1962), by adding 5% glutamic acid as a “stress” factor to a 15% protein diet, containing fish meal as a sole source protein, demonstrated that the sulfur amino acids (methionine and cystine) were the first limiting in those fish meals which gave very poor growth. Hegsted (1944), Klain et al. (1958), Fisher et al. (1960), Dean and Scott (1965), and many…

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

IN A study of dietary factors affecting a 3-week chick bioassay of fish meal quality, Miller and Kifer (1970) indicated that the method responded to the quality as well as to the quantity of the dietary protein. Chicks fed an aged fish meal as the sole source of protein were very sensitive to a detrimental excessive addition (2.59%) of glycine and also to small additions of methionine and lysine. Nevertheless, the addition of 0.36% arginine to the aged fish meal gave a 9% increase in growth. Ousterhout and Snyder (1962), by adding 5% glutamic acid as a “stress” factor to a 15% protein diet, containing fish meal as a sole source protein, demonstrated that the sulfur amino acids (methionine and cystine) were the first limiting in those fish meals which gave very poor growth. Hegsted (1944), Klain et al. (1958), Fisher et al. (1960), Dean and Scott (1965), and many…

Key concepts: Fish meal, Methionine, Bioassay, Cystine, Protein quality, Food science, Fish <Actinopterygii>, Meal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of Glutamic Acid and Antiacids on Chick Bioassay of Protein Quality of Fish Meals — Research Paper | ScholarLens