Excellence at the Cost of Social Justice? Negotiating and Balancing Priorities in Gifted Education
David Yun Dai
Abstract
David Yun Dai
Abstract
Gifted education is often faulted as compromising the principle of equity and perpetuating social inequalities. This article focuses on making gifted education socially defensible and educationally productive. To accomplish this goal, key values and priorities guiding policy and practice, such as excellence, selectivity, diversity, equity and social equality, and efficiency or educational productivity, must be endorsed. To understand how these issues have been dealt with, several cases and examples that have a bearing on how to negotiate and balance these values and priorities without resorting to radical, dogmatic positions are discussed. Finally, several recommendations for practice that will help resolve the tension between excellence, selectivity, and efficiency on the one hand and diversity, equity, and social equality on the other are made.
OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Gifted education is often faulted as compromising the principle of equity and perpetuating social inequalities. This article focuses on making gifted education socially defensible and educationally productive. To accomplish this goal, key values and priorities guiding policy and practice, such as excellence, selectivity, diversity, equity and social equality, and efficiency or educational productivity, must be endorsed. To understand how these issues have been dealt with, several cases and examples that have a bearing on how to negotiate and balance these values and priorities without resorting to radical, dogmatic positions are discussed. Finally, several recommendations for practice that will help resolve the tension between excellence, selectivity, and efficiency on the one hand and diversity, equity, and social equality on the other are made.
Key concepts: Excellence, Equity (law), Negotiation, Social equality, Psychology, Social justice, Diversity (politics), Public relations