1983Transactions of the ASAERequires access

Characteristics of Raindrop Throughfall Under Corn Canopy

Nigel W.T. Quinn, J. M. Laflen

Open publisher page 51 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT A laboratory rainfall simulator was used to study the raindrop size and velocity under a corn canopy. Drop sizes were measured by using a dye-paper technique, and drop velocities were measured photographically. Stemflow was calculated on the basis of rainfall under the canopy and incident rainfall above the canopy. Up to 49% of incident rainfall appeared as stemflow. Drops that directly penetrated the crop canopy accounted for much of the throughfall kinetic energy; drips from leaf margins also contributed greatly to throughfall kinetic energy. Drops that splashed from leaves were quite small and contained little kinetic energy. The ratio of the kinetic energy at ground level to kinetic energy at the top of the canopy was compared with the ratio predicted by Wischmeier and Smith (1978) for use in the Universal Soil Loss Equation. The comparison indicated little difference between what we observed and that predicted.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT A laboratory rainfall simulator was used to study the raindrop size and velocity under a corn canopy. Drop sizes were measured by using a dye-paper technique, and drop velocities were measured photographically. Stemflow was calculated on the basis of rainfall under the canopy and incident rainfall above the canopy. Up to 49% of incident rainfall appeared as stemflow. Drops that directly penetrated the crop canopy accounted for much of the throughfall kinetic energy; drips from leaf margins also contributed greatly to throughfall kinetic energy. Drops that splashed from leaves were quite small and contained little kinetic energy. The ratio of the kinetic energy at ground level to kinetic energy at the top of the canopy was compared with the ratio predicted by Wischmeier and Smith (1978) for use in the Universal Soil Loss Equation. The comparison indicated little difference between what we observed and that predicted.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 51 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT A laboratory rainfall simulator was used to study the raindrop size and velocity under a corn canopy. Drop sizes were measured by using a dye-paper technique, and drop velocities were measured photographically. Stemflow was calculated on the basis of rainfall under the canopy and incident rainfall above the canopy. Up to 49% of incident rainfall appeared as stemflow. Drops that directly penetrated the crop canopy accounted for much of the throughfall kinetic energy; drips from leaf margins also contributed greatly to throughfall kinetic energy. Drops that splashed from leaves were quite small and contained little kinetic energy. The ratio of the kinetic energy at ground level to kinetic energy at the top of the canopy was compared with the ratio predicted by Wischmeier and Smith (1978) for use in the Universal Soil Loss Equation. The comparison indicated little difference between what we observed and that predicted.

Key concepts: Throughfall, Canopy, Stemflow, Kinetic energy, Environmental science, Drop (telecommunication), Atmospheric sciences, Hydrology (agriculture)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Characteristics of Raindrop Throughfall Under Corn Canopy — Research Paper | ScholarLens