Irrigation and imperialism: The causes and consequences of a shift from subsistence to cash cropping
Donald W. Attwood
Abstract
Donald W. Attwood
Abstract
Dependency theorists and others have suggested that villagers in British India were compelled to grow cash crops under canal irrigation and this made them more vulnerable to famines. Evidence on cropping patterns in western India c. 1900 shows that cultivators had good technical reasons for not irrigating subsistence crops. In response to fiscal pressures and cultivators’ choices, the government turned from a policy favouring subsistence crop irrigation to one favouring sugarcane. Paradoxically, this new policy also stimulated foodgrain production, providing greater subsistence security for the region.
OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Dependency theorists and others have suggested that villagers in British India were compelled to grow cash crops under canal irrigation and this made them more vulnerable to famines. Evidence on cropping patterns in western India c. 1900 shows that cultivators had good technical reasons for not irrigating subsistence crops. In response to fiscal pressures and cultivators’ choices, the government turned from a policy favouring subsistence crop irrigation to one favouring sugarcane. Paradoxically, this new policy also stimulated foodgrain production, providing greater subsistence security for the region.
Key concepts: Subsistence agriculture, Cropping, Cash crop, Irrigation, Cash, Government (linguistics), Economics, Agricultural economics