1994Communications in Soil Science and Plant AnalysisRequires access

Comparison of a dual‐inlet gas isotope ratio mass spectrometry system and an automated single‐inlet mass spectrometry system for δ13C analysis

J. Diane Knight, A. M. Matus, Chris van Kessel, G. R. Parry, A. E. Slinkard

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

A dual‐inlet isotope ratio mass spectrometer (VG‐SIRA 12, Isotech, Middlewich, England) using sealed‐glass combustion sample preparation and an automated single‐inlet isotope ratio mass spectrometry system (RoboPrep Sample Converter interfaced with a TracerMass Stable Isotope Detector, Europa Scientific, Crewe, England) were compared for δ13C analysis. Two hundred twenty four samples of plant and animal tissue were analyzed for S13C using the two systems. Delta 13C values obtained from the two instruments were highly correlated (r2=0.986, P=0.0001). The slope of the relationship was not different from one nor was the Y‐intercept different from zero (Y=‐0.2 + 1.0X; P=0.86 and P=0.28 for the slope and Y‐intercept, respectively). In addition, samples from two complete experiments were run on both mass spectrometery systems and statistical analyses performed. In both experiments, differences between treatments were detectable using the RoboPrep system that were not detectable using the SIRA 12 system. In all cases mean δ13C values were comparable between the two systems, and coefficients of variation were low; well within acceptable experimental limits.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A dual‐inlet isotope ratio mass spectrometer (VG‐SIRA 12, Isotech, Middlewich, England) using sealed‐glass combustion sample preparation and an automated single‐inlet isotope ratio mass spectrometry system (RoboPrep Sample Converter interfaced with a TracerMass Stable Isotope Detector, Europa Scientific, Crewe, England) were compared for δ13C analysis. Two hundred twenty four samples of plant and animal tissue were analyzed for S13C using the two systems. Delta 13C values obtained from the two instruments were highly correlated (r2=0.986, P=0.0001). The slope of the relationship was not different from one nor was the Y‐intercept different from zero (Y=‐0.2 + 1.0X; P=0.86 and P=0.28 for the slope and Y‐intercept, respectively). In addition, samples from two complete experiments were run on both mass spectrometery systems and statistical analyses performed. In both experiments, differences between treatments were detectable using the RoboPrep system that were not detectable using the SIRA 12 system. In all cases mean δ13C values were comparable between the two systems, and coefficients of variation were low; well within acceptable experimental limits.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A dual‐inlet isotope ratio mass spectrometer (VG‐SIRA 12, Isotech, Middlewich, England) using sealed‐glass combustion sample preparation and an automated single‐inlet isotope ratio mass spectrometry system (RoboPrep Sample Converter interfaced with a TracerMass Stable Isotope Detector, Europa Scientific, Crewe, England) were compared for δ13C analysis. Two hundred twenty four samples of plant and animal tissue were analyzed for S13C using the two systems. Delta 13C values obtained from the two instruments were highly correlated (r2=0.986, P=0.0001). The slope of the relationship was not different from one nor was the Y‐intercept different from zero (Y=‐0.2 + 1.0X; P=0.86 and P=0.28 for the slope and Y‐intercept, respectively). In addition, samples from two complete experiments were run on both mass spectrometery systems and statistical analyses performed. In both experiments, differences between treatments were detectable using the RoboPrep system that were not detectable using the SIRA 12 system. In all cases mean δ13C values were comparable between the two systems, and coefficients of variation were low; well within acceptable experimental limits.

Key concepts: Inlet, Mass spectrometry, Isotope-ratio mass spectrometry, Isotope, Analytical Chemistry (journal), Isotope analysis, Chemistry, Stable isotope ratio

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of a dual‐inlet gas isotope ratio mass spectrometry system and an automated single‐inlet mass spectrometry system for δ13C analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens