1990•New PhytologistOpen access

Genetic variation in ectomycorrhiza formation byPisolithus arhizusonPinus pinasterandPinus banksiana

Mohammed Sghir Lamhamedi, J. André Fortin, Harry H. Kope, Bradley R. Kropp

Open full text 65 citations

Abstract

summary The ability of 28 monokaryons and 78 reconstituted dikaryons ofPisolithus arhizus(Scop, pers Pers.) Rauchert [Syn.:Pisolithus tinctorius(Pers.) Coker & Couch] to form ectomycorrhizas onPinus pinaster(Ait.) Sol. andPinus banksiana(Lamb.) was studied using the growth pouch method. The ability to form mycorrhiza and promote growth ofP. pinasterdiffered both between and within monkaryons and dikaryons. Some monokaryons and dikaryons failed to form ectomycorrhizas. Monokaryons formed fewer ectomycorrhizas onP. pinasterthan dikaryons. The heterokaryotic state was necessary for the full expression of ectomycorrhiza‐forming ability. Growth ofP. pinasterwas more strongly correlated with ectomycorrhiza formation by dikaryons than by monokaryons.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

summary The ability of 28 monokaryons and 78 reconstituted dikaryons ofPisolithus arhizus(Scop, pers Pers.) Rauchert [Syn.:Pisolithus tinctorius(Pers.) Coker & Couch] to form ectomycorrhizas onPinus pinaster(Ait.) Sol. andPinus banksiana(Lamb.) was studied using the growth pouch method. The ability to form mycorrhiza and promote growth ofP. pinasterdiffered both between and within monkaryons and dikaryons. Some monokaryons and dikaryons failed to form ectomycorrhizas. Monokaryons formed fewer ectomycorrhizas onP. pinasterthan dikaryons. The heterokaryotic state was necessary for the full expression of ectomycorrhiza‐forming ability. Growth ofP. pinasterwas more strongly correlated with ectomycorrhiza formation by dikaryons than by monokaryons.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 65 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

summary The ability of 28 monokaryons and 78 reconstituted dikaryons ofPisolithus arhizus(Scop, pers Pers.) Rauchert [Syn.:Pisolithus tinctorius(Pers.) Coker & Couch] to form ectomycorrhizas onPinus pinaster(Ait.) Sol. andPinus banksiana(Lamb.) was studied using the growth pouch method. The ability to form mycorrhiza and promote growth ofP. pinasterdiffered both between and within monkaryons and dikaryons. Some monokaryons and dikaryons failed to form ectomycorrhizas. Monokaryons formed fewer ectomycorrhizas onP. pinasterthan dikaryons. The heterokaryotic state was necessary for the full expression of ectomycorrhiza‐forming ability. Growth ofP. pinasterwas more strongly correlated with ectomycorrhiza formation by dikaryons than by monokaryons.

Key concepts: Pisolithus, Pinus pinaster, Ectomycorrhiza, Mycorrhiza, Botany, Biology, Dikaryon, Mycelium

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Genetic variation in ectomycorrhiza formation byPisolithus arhizusonPinus pinasterandPinus banksiana — Research Paper | ScholarLens